Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23749404›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2013

Comparative analysis of Tsc1 and Tsc2 single and double radial glial cell mutants.

Ulrike Mietzsch, James McKenna, R Michelle Reith, Sharon W Way, Michael J Gambello

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Rodent Models for ASD Biomarker Development.Advances in neurobiology · 2024
    Review
  5. iScience · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ulrike MietzschDepartment of Pediatrics/Neonatology, Indiana School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202.
James McKenna
R Michelle Reith
Sharon W Way
Michael J Gambello
Emory University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Chicago · USUrology of Indiana · US

Funding

Mouse Models of the Neuropathology of Tuberous Sclerosis ComplexR01NS060804 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI GAMBELLO, MICHAEL J · 2007 to 2011
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060804NINDS NIH HHS R01NS060804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a neurodevelopmental disorder with variable expressivity. Heterozygous mutations in either of two genes, TSC1 (hamartin) or TSC2 (tuberin), are responsible for most cases. Hamartin and tuberin form a heterodimer that functions as a major cellular inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) kinase. Genotype-phenotype studies suggest that TSC2 mutations are associated with a more severe neurologic phenotype, although the biologic basis for the difference between TSC1- and TSC2-based disease is unclear. Here we performed a study to compare and contrast the brain phenotypes of Tsc1 and Tsc2 single and double mutants. Using Tsc1 and Tsc2 floxed alleles and a radial glial transgenic Cre driver (FVB-Tg(GFAP-cre)25Mes/J), we deleted Tsc1 and/or Tsc2 in radial glial progenitor cells. Single and double mutants had remarkably similar phenotypes: early postnatal mortality, brain overgrowth, laminar disruption, astrogliosis, a paucity of oligodendroglia, and myelination defects. Double Tsc1/Tsc2 mutants died earlier than single mutants, and single mutants showed differences in the location of heterotopias and the organization of the hippocampal stratum pyramidale. The differences were not due to differential mTORC1 activation or feedback inhibition on Akt. These data provide further genetic evidence for individual hamartin and tuberin functions that may explain some of the genotype-phenotype differences seen in the human disease.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBrainCell DifferentiationCell Line, TransformedCell SurvivalFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMutationGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinTSC1 protein, humanTsc1 protein, mouseTSC2 protein, humanTsc2 protein, mouseTuberous Sclerosis Complex 1 ProteinTuberous Sclerosis Complex 2 ProteinTumor Suppressor Proteinsbraingenotypehamartinphenotypetuberin

Identifiers

PMID23749404
PMCPMC13637844
OpenAlexW2171911863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.