Trial reportJournal of neurology2013
Low-frequency subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for axial symptoms in advanced Parkinson's disease.
Trial report in Journal of neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.
- Speech and Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease, Essential Tremor, and Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of subthalamic deep brain stimulation programming strategies for gait disorders in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of the Efficacy of Deep Brain Stimulation in Different Targets in Improving Gait in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Pooled it
- Low-frequency STN-DBS provides acute gait improvements in Parkinson's disease: a double-blinded randomised cross-over feasibility trial.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021Trial
- Randomized, Blinded Pilot Testing of Nonconventional Stimulation Patterns and Shapes in Parkinson's Disease and Essential Tremor: Evidence for Further Evaluating Narrow and Biphasic Pulses.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2016Trial
- Frequency-dependent effects of motor thalamus deep brain stimulation on speech and swallowing.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Low-Frequency Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Targeted deep brain stimulation of the motor thalamus improves speech and swallowing motor functions after cerebral lesions.Research square · 2024Article
- Subthalamic 85 Hz deep brain stimulation improves walking pace and stride length in Parkinson's disease patients.Neurological research and practice · 2023Article
- Differential spatiotemporal gait effects with frequency and dopaminergic modulation in STN-DBS.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- Subthalamic deep brain stimulation for refractory Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome: clinical outcome and functional connectivity.Journal of neurology · 2022Article
- Parkinson's Disease Symptoms Associated with Developing On-State Axial Symptoms Early after Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Ophthalmologic problems correlates with cognitive impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Past, Present, and Future of Deep Brain Stimulation: Hardware, Software, Imaging, Physiology and Novel Approaches.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- Neuromodulation of cognition in Parkinson's disease.Progress in brain research · 2022Review
- Long-term success of low-frequency subthalamic nucleus stimulation for Parkinson's disease depends on tremor severity and symptom duration.Brain communications · 2021Article
- Controlling Clinical States Governed by Different Temporal Dynamics With Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation: A Principled Framework.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Update on Current Technologies for Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease.Journal of movement disorders · 2020Article
- The effect of STN DBS on modulating brain oscillations: consequences for motor and cognitive behavior.Experimental brain research · 2020Review
- Speech Intelligibility During Clinical and Low Frequency.Brain sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Axial symptoms such as freezing of gait and falls are common manifestations of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) and are partially responsive to medical treatment. High-frequency (≥130 Hz) deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is highly efficacious in ameliorating appendicular symptoms in PD. However, it is typically less effective in improving axial symptomatology, especially in the long term. We have studied the effects of low-frequency stimulation (LFS) (≤80 Hz) for improving speech, gait and balance dysfunction in the largest patient population to date. PD patients with bilateral STN-DBS and resistant axial symptoms were switched from chronic 130 Hz stimulation to LFS and followed up to 4 years. Primary outcome measures were total motor UPDRS scores, and axial and gait subscores before and after LFS. Bivariate analyses and correlation coefficients were calculated for the different conditions. Potential predictors of therapeutic response were also investigated. Forty-five advanced PD patients who had high frequency stimulation (HFS) for 39.5 ± 27.8 consecutive months were switched to LFS. LFS was kept on for a median period of 111.5 days before the assessment. There was no significant improvement in any of the primary outcomes between HFS and LFS, although a minority of patients preferred to be maintained on LFS for longer periods of time. No predictive factors of response could be identified. There was overall no improvement from LFS in axial symptoms. This could be partly due to some study limitations. Larger prospective trials are warranted to better clarify the impact of stimulation frequency on axial signs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.