Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23749093›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2013

Long-term investigations on Toxoplasma gondii-infected primary chicken macrophages.

Irene Malkwitz, Angela Berndt, Arwid Daugschies, Berit Bangoura

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Irene MalkwitzInstitute of Parasitology, Centre for Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken 35, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Angela Berndt
Arwid Daugschies
Berit Bangoura

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxoplasma (T.) gondii is known to infect various cell types including macrophages. In the present study, we generated monocyte-derived macrophage cultures from chicken blood. By flow cytometrical analysis, 84.5% of the cultivated cells showed typical macrophage properties. Macrophage cultures were cultivated at either 37 °C or 40 °C, respectively, and were infected 72 to 96 h post isolationem with tachyzoites of the T. gondii type II strain ME49 at a rate of 7.5 tachyzoites per host cell. Light microscopical investigations revealed incorporation of tachyzoites into the macrophages and gradual destruction of the infected macrophage culture. Parasite multiplication was observed by a quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) based on the 529-bp fragment specific for T. gondii. Samples were drawn 1 h post infectionem (p.i.), as well as 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h p.i. The parasite replication curve showed a transient decrease of parasite stages 12 h p.i. followed by a tachyzoite multiplication. The comparison of different culture conditions showed a significantly higher replication rate of T. gondii at 37 °C (median value 48 h p.i., 289.2% of the initial tachyzoite number) compared to cultures incubated at 40 °C (median value 48 h p.i., 73.1% of the initial tachyzoite number) throughout the observation period (P < 0.05). In general, replication rates were significantly lower than in a standard VERO cell cultures at 37 °C (P < 0.05). The observed differences were attributed to the physiological chicken macrophage reaction at 40 °C probably approximating the situation in vivo.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedChickensChlorocebus aethiopsFlow CytometryMacrophagesMicroscopy, ConfocalReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionToxoplasmaToxoplasmosis, AnimalVero Cells

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.