Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23748958›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2013

Scalable web services for the PSIPRED Protein Analysis Workbench.

Daniel W A Buchan, Federico Minneci, Tim C O Nugent, Kevin Bryson, David T Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 729 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
729citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

729 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prediction of Intrinsically Disordered Regions That Bind RNA with DisoRDPbind.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  12. Multi-Epitope mRNA Vaccine TargetingBioinformatics and biology insights · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Accurate and Fast Prediction of Intrinsic Disorder Using flDPnn.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article

669 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel W A BuchanDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT. d.buchan@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Federico Minneci
Tim C O Nugent
Kevin Bryson
David T Jones

Funding

Medical Research Council G0902087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we present the new UCL Bioinformatics Group's PSIPRED Protein Analysis Workbench. The Workbench unites all of our previously available analysis methods into a single web-based framework. The new web portal provides a greatly streamlined user interface with a number of new features to allow users to better explore their results. We offer a number of additional services to enable computationally scalable execution of our prediction methods; these include SOAP and XML-RPC web server access and new HADOOP packages. All software and services are available via the UCL Bioinformatics Group website at http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/.

Indexed as

Protein ConformationSoftwareAnimalsInternetMembrane ProteinsMiceProteinsSequence Analysis, ProteinStructural Homology, ProteinMembrane ProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID23748958
PMCPMC3692098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.