Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23748872›Full record

ReviewInvestigational new drugs2013

Cardiac glycosides in cancer therapy: from preclinical investigations towards clinical trials.

M Slingerland, C Cerella, H J Guchelaar, M Diederich, H Gelderblom

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Investigational new drugs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. "Cardiac glycosides"-quo vaditis?-past, present, and future?Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

M SlingerlandDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. M.Slingerland@lumc.nl
C Cerella
H J Guchelaar
M Diederich
H Gelderblom
Leiden University Medical Center · NLHôpital Kirchberg · LUSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac glycosides have a long history in the treatment of cardiac disease. However, several preclinical studies as well as two phase I studies have shown that cardenolides may also possess anticancer effects. The mechanisms of these anticancer effects may include intracellular decrease of K(+) and increase of Na(+) and Ca(2+); intracellular acidification; inhibition of IL-8 production and of the TNF-α/NF-κB pathway; inhibition of DNA topoisomerase II and activation of the Src kinase pathway. To date three cardiac glycosides have been developed for treatment of cancer and were tested in a phase 1 clinical trial to determine dose limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose. Future studies of this novel class of anticancer drugs are warranted to determine their possible role in cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCardiac GlycosidesCell DeathDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHumansNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsCardiac Glycosides

Identifiers

PMID23748872
OpenAlexW2008722476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.