ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2013
Nearly complete 28S rRNA gene sequences confirm new hypotheses of sponge evolution.
Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The complete mitochondrial genome of the deep-sea methanotrophic spongesJournal of genetics · 2024Article
- Article
- The complete mitochondrial genome of the invasive cyanobacteriospongeMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023Article
- Enigmazole C: A Cytotoxic Macrocyclic Lactone and Its Ring-Opened Derivatives from a New Species ofJournal of natural products · 2022Review
- Exploring Chemical Diversity ofMarine drugs · 2021Review
- Article
- Identification of an aquaculture poriferan "Pest with Potential" and its phylogenetic implications.PeerJ · 2018Article
- Origin and Evolution of the Sponge Aggregation Factor Gene Family.Molecular biology and evolution · 2017Article
- Article
- Article
- Discordance between morphological and molecular species boundaries among Caribbean species of the reef sponge Callyspongia.Ecology and evolution · 2015Article
- The origin of the ADAR gene family and animal RNA editing.BMC evolutionary biology · 2015Article
- Proposal for a revised classification of the Demospongiae (Porifera).Frontiers in zoology · 2015Article
- Article
- Deceptive desmas: molecular phylogenetics suggests a new classification and uncovers convergent evolution of lithistid demosponges.PloS one · 2015Article
- Transcriptomic analysis of differential host gene expression upon uptake of symbionts: a case study with Symbiodinium and the major bioeroding sponge Cliona varians.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Two distinct microbial communities revealed in the sponge Cinachyrella.Frontiers in microbiology · 2014Article
- The Porifera Ontology (PORO): enhancing sponge systematics with an anatomy ontology.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2014Article
- Molecular phylogenies support homoplasy of multiple morphological characters used in the taxonomy of Heteroscleromorpha (Porifera: Demospongiae).Integrative and comparative biology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The highly collaborative research sponsored by the NSF-funded Assembling the Porifera Tree of Life (PorToL) project is providing insights into some of the most difficult questions in metazoan systematics. Our understanding of phylogenetic relationships within the phylum Porifera has changed considerably with increased taxon sampling and data from additional molecular markers. PorToL researchers have falsified earlier phylogenetic hypotheses, discovered novel phylogenetic alliances, found phylogenetic homes for enigmatic taxa, and provided a more precise understanding of the evolution of skeletal features, secondary metabolites, body organization, and symbioses. Some of these exciting new discoveries are shared in the papers that form this issue of Integrative and Comparative Biology. Our analyses of over 300 nearly complete 28S ribosomal subunit gene sequences provide specific case studies that illustrate how our dataset confirms new hypotheses of sponge evolution. We recovered monophyletic clades for all 4 classes of sponges, as well as the 4 major clades of Demospongiae (Keratosa, Myxospongiae, Haploscleromorpha, and Heteroscleromorpha), but our phylogeny differs in several aspects from traditional classifications. In most major clades of sponges, families within orders appear to be paraphyletic. Although additional sampling of genes and taxa are needed to establish whether this pattern results from a lack of phylogenetic resolution or from a paraphyletic classification system, many of our results are congruent with those obtained from 18S ribosomal subunit gene sequences and complete mitochondrial genomes. These data provide further support for a revision of the traditional classification of sponges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.