Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23748464›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2013

Irinotecan, vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide for refractory or relapsed medulloblastoma/PNET in pediatric patients.

Hyery Kim, Hyoung Jin Kang, Ji Won Lee, June Dong Park, Kyung Duk Park, Hee Young Shin, Hyo Seop Ahn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Anticancer Activity of Natural Compounds from Plant and Marine Environment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hyery KimDepartment of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyoung Jin Kang
Ji Won Lee
June Dong Park
Kyung Duk Park
Hee Young Shin
Hyo Seop Ahn
Seoul National University · KRNew Generation University College · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe treatment outcome of pediatric refractory or relapsed brain tumor is very dismal, and effective salvage chemotherapy is not established. The combination of irinotecan, vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide was administered to pediatric patients with refractory or relapsed brain tumors as a salvage treatment at our institution.

methodsThe combination regimen was administered since June 2006 and consisted of irinotecan (300 mg/m(2), d0), vincristine (2 mg/m(2), d0), cisplatin (60 mg/m(2), d0), cyclophosphamide (1,000 mg/m(2), d1), and etoposide (100 mg/m(2)/day, d0-2). Patients could concurrently receive radiotherapy, surgery, and/or high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue. The medical records of all patients were retrospectively analyzed.

resultsThirteen patients with refractory or relapsed brain tumor were included (medulloblastoma, n = 12; central nervous system primitive neuroectodermal tumor, n = 1). Median time from diagnosis to this combination chemotherapy was 30 months (range, 3-111 months), and median cycle administered was four cycles (range 1-22 cycles). Objective tumor response at the end of chemotherapy was 38.5 % including three patients with complete response and two with partial response. One patient showed complete response and achieved long-term survival with this combination chemotherapy, and two patients achieved long-term survival with multimodality treatments. There was no grade III or IV toxicity related to this combination chemotherapy except for thrombocytopenia and neutropenia.

conclusionsThe combination of irinotecan, vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide may produce objective responses in pediatric patients with refractory or relapsed medulloblastoma or primitive neuroectodermal tumor.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsCamptothecinChemoradiotherapyChildChild, PreschoolCisplatinDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEtoposideFemaleHumansIrinotecanMaleMedulloblastomaCamptothecinCisplatinEtoposideIrinotecanVincristine

Identifiers

PMID23748464
OpenAlexW2014718981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.