Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23748445›Full record

ArticleNature2013

A single pair of interneurons commands the Drosophila feeding motor program.

Thomas F Flood, Shinya Iguchi, Michael Gorczyca, Benjamin White, Kei Ito, Motojiro Yoshihara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dual roles ofiScience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Connectomic analysis of taste circuits inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas F FloodDeptartment of Neurobiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, USA.
Shinya Iguchi
Michael Gorczyca
Benjamin White
Kei Ito
Motojiro Yoshihara

Funding

Identifying Neural Substrates of Behavior in Drosophila MelanogasterZIAMH002800 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI WHITE, BENJAMIN H · 2009 to 2025
$29.2M
Molecular Mechanism of Synaptic PlasticityR01MH085958 · NIMH · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI YOSHIHARA, MOTOJIRO · 2009 to 2013
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS MH85958NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many feeding behaviours are the result of stereotyped, organized sequences of motor patterns. These patterns have been the subject of neuroethological studies, such as electrophysiological characterization of neurons governing prey capture in toads. However, technical limitations have prevented detailed study of the functional role of these neurons, a common problem for vertebrate organisms. Complexities involved in studies of whole-animal behaviour can be resolved in Drosophila, in which remote activation of brain cells by genetic means enables us to examine the nervous system in freely moving animals to identify neurons that govern a specific behaviour, and then to repeatedly target and manipulate these neurons to characterize their function. Here we show neurons that generate the feeding motor program in Drosophila. We carried out an unbiased screen using remote neuronal activation and identified a critical pair of brain cells that induces the entire feeding sequence when activated. These 'feeding neurons' (here abbreviated to Fdg neurons for brevity) are also essential for normal feeding as their suppression or ablation eliminates sugar-induced feeding behaviour. Activation of a single Fdg neuron induces asymmetric feeding behaviour and ablation of a single Fdg neuron distorts the sugar-induced feeding behaviour to become asymmetric, indicating the direct role of these neurons in shaping motor-program execution. Furthermore, recording neuronal activity and calcium imaging simultaneously during feeding behaviour reveals that the Fdg neurons respond to food presentation, but only in starved flies. Our results demonstrate that Fdg neurons operate firmly within the sensorimotor watershed, downstream of sensory and metabolic cues and at the top of the feeding motor hierarchy, to execute the decision to feed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCalcium SignalingCarbohydratesCuesDecision MakingDrosophila melanogasterFeeding BehaviorFemaleFoodFood DeprivationInterneuronsMaleModels, NeurologicalMovementPharynxCarbohydrates

Identifiers

PMID23748445
PMCPMC3727048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.