Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23748441›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2013

Effect of netupitant, a highly selective NK₁ receptor antagonist, on the pharmacokinetics of palonosetron and impact of the fixed dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron when coadministered with ketoconazole, rifampicin, and oral contraceptives.

Selma Calcagnile, Corinna Lanzarotti, Giorgia Rossi, Anders Henriksson, Klaus Peter Kammerer, Wolfgang Timmer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. 2016 Updated MASCC/ESMO Consensus Recommendations: Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting Following High Emetic Risk Chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Effect of netupitant, a highly selective NK₁ receptor antagonist, on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, erythromycin, and dexamethasone.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Role of CYP3A in Oral Contraceptives Clearance.Clinical and translational science · 2018
    Review
  11. Drug-drug interaction profile of components of a fixed combination of netupitant and palonosetron: Review of clinical data.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2016
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Netupitant/Palonosetron.Hospital pharmacy · 2015
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Selma CalcagnileCorporate Clinical Development, Helsinn Healthcare, SA, Lugano, Switzerland, sca@helsinn.com.
Corinna Lanzarotti
Giorgia Rossi
Anders Henriksson
Klaus Peter Kammerer
Wolfgang Timmer
Clinical Research Services · DEHelsinn Therapeutics (United States) · USHelsinn (Switzerland) · CHIQVIA (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNeurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK1 RAs) are commonly coadministered with a 5-HT3 RA such as palonosetron to prevent nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy. Netupitant, a new highly selective NK1 RA, is both a substrate for and a moderate inhibitor of CYP3A4. Three studies were designed to evaluate the potential drug-drug interaction of netupitant with palonosetron and of the fixed dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron, NEPA, with an inhibitor (ketoconazole), an inducer (rifampicin) and a substrate (oral contraceptives) of CYP3A4.

methodsStudy 1 was a three-way crossover in 18 healthy subjects receiving netupitant alone, palonosetron alone, and the combination of both antiemetics. Studies 2 and 3 were two-way crossover trials where healthy subjects received NEPA (the fixed dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron). In study 2, 36 subjects received NEPA alone (day 1) and in combination with ketoconazole or rifampicin. In study 3, 24 healthy women received ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel alone or in combination with NEPA (day 1).

resultsThere were no significant pharmacokinetic interactions between netupitant and palonosetron. Ketoconazole increased netupitant area under curve (AUC) by 140 % and C max by 25 %. Rifampicin decreased netupitant AUC by 83 % and C max by 62 %. NEPA did not significantly affect exposure to ethinylestradiol, while systemic exposure to levonorgestrel increased by 40 %, but this was not considered clinically relevant.

conclusionsThere were no clinically relevant interactions between netupitant and palonosetron, or between NEPA and oral contraceptives. The coadministration of NEPA with inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4 may require dose adjustments. Treatments were well tolerated.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntiemeticsArea Under CurveBenzeneacetamidesContraceptives, OralCross-Over StudiesDrug InteractionsFemaleHumansIsoquinolinesKetoconazoleMiddle AgedNeurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsPalonosetronPiperazinesAntiemeticsBenzeneacetamidesContraceptives, OralIsoquinolinesKetoconazolenetupitantNeurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsPalonosetronPiperazinesPyridinesQuinuclidinesRifampin

Identifiers

PMID23748441
OpenAlexW1964623352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.