Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23748417›Full record

ArticleDer Anaesthesist2013

[Effects of overlapping induction on the utilization of complex operating structures: estimation using the practical application of a simulation model].

S Bercker, R Waschipky, F Hokema, W Brecht

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S BerckerKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Stabsstelle OP-Management, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103 Leipzig, Deutschland. sven.bercker@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
R Waschipky
F Hokema
W Brecht

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reduction of costs or increase in efficiency may lead to optimization of cost-effectiveness in operating rooms. Overlapping induction by additional anesthesia teams reduces the changeover time between surgical interventions and, therefore, increases utilization effectiveness of surgical theatres. From an economic point of view overlapping induction should be performed where the highest increase in efficacy and revenues is possible. This article presents a software tool to vary the number of anesthesia teams in different single or clustered operating rooms. Using the example of a university hospital it could be demonstrated that the simulated addition of one anesthesia team to different clusters of operations rooms resulted in an increase of 15-40 % of operations and an increase up to 81 % of utilization effectiveness. Therefore, the presented simulation tool may help to estimate the maximum effect of staff allocation in surgical theatres.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAnesthesiaAnesthesiologyAppointments and SchedulesCost-Benefit AnalysisHospitals, UniversityHumansOperating RoomsPatient Care TeamWorkforce

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.