Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23748139›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta2014

Sulfenic acid chemistry, detection and cellular lifetime.

Vinayak Gupta, Kate S Carroll

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 173 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 440 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Combatting melioidosis with chemical synthetic lethality.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vinayak GuptaDepartment of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA.
Kate S Carroll
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Probing the role of cysteine sulfenylation in cell signalingR01GM102187 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Kate Suzanne Carroll · 2012 to 2026
$4.6M
Nucleophilic Inhibitors for Targeting Redox-Sensitive KinasesR01CA174864 · NCI · SCRIPPS FLORIDA · PI CARROLL, KATE SUZANNE · 2014 to 2017
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA174864NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102187NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM102187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReactive oxygen species-mediated cysteine sulfenic acid modification has emerged as an important regulatory mechanism in cell signaling. The stability of sulfenic acid in proteins is dictated by the local microenvironment and ability of antioxidants to reduce this modification. Several techniques for detecting this cysteine modification have been developed, including direct and in situ methods. SCOPE OF REVIEW: This review presents a historical discussion of sulfenic acid chemistry and highlights key examples of this modification in proteins. A comprehensive survey of available detection techniques with advantages and limitations is discussed. Finally, issues pertaining to rates of sulfenic acid formation, reduction, and chemical trapping methods are also covered. MAJOR

conclusionsEarly chemical models of sulfenic acid yielded important insights into the unique reactivity of this species. Subsequent pioneering studies led to the characterization of sulfenic acid formation in proteins. In parallel, the discovery of oxidant-mediated cell signaling pathways and pathological oxidative stress has led to significant interest in methods to detect these modifications. Advanced methods allow for direct chemical trapping of protein sulfenic acids directly in cells and tissues. At the same time, many sulfenic acids are short-lived and the reactivity of current probes must be improved to sample these species, while at the same time, preserving their chemical selectivity. Inhibitors with binding scaffolds can be rationally designed to target sulfenic acid modifications in specific proteins. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: Ever increasing roles for protein sulfenic acids have been uncovered in physiology and pathology. A more complete understanding of sulfenic acid-mediated regulatory mechanisms will continue to require rigorous and new chemical insights. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Current methods to study reactive oxygen species - pros and cons and biophysics of membrane proteins. Guest Editor: Christine Winterbourn.

Indexed as

Cell Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsHumansProteinsReactive Oxygen SpeciesSignal TransductionSulfenic AcidsProteinsReactive Oxygen SpeciesSulfenic AcidsCellular lifetimes of sulfenic acidSulfenic acidSulfenic acid chemistrySulfenic acid detection method

Identifiers

PMID23748139
PMCPMC4184475
OpenAlexW2042662175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.