Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23748094›Full record

ReviewNeuropharmacology2014

On the motivational properties of reward cues: Individual differences.

Terry E Robinson, Lindsay M Yager, Elizabeth S Cogan, Benjamin T Saunders

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Variants of the P3 event-related potential operate as indicators of distinct mechanisms contributing to problematic alcohol use.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genomic Loci Influencing Cue-Reactivity in Heterogeneous Stock Rats.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Terry E RobinsonDepartment of Psychology (Biopsychology Program), University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, East Hall, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: ter@umich.edu.
Lindsay M Yager
Elizabeth S Cogan
Benjamin T Saunders

Funding

Variation in Motivational Properties of Reward Cues: Implications for AddictionP01DA031656 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALDRIDGE, J WAYNE · 2012 to 2016
$6.3M
NIDA Training Program in Neuroscience-Administrative SupplementT32DA007281 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Shelly Beth Flagel · 1995 to 2026
$5.7M
NEURAL BASIS OF BEHAVIORAL SENSITIZATIONR37DA004294 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROBINSON, TERRY E. · 2002 to 2010
$3.1M
Variability in Responsivity to Drug CuesF31DA030799 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI YAGER, LINDSAY · 2012 to 2013
$65k
Variation in the abilty of drug cues to reinstate drug seekingF31DA030801 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SAUNDERS, BENJAMIN THOMAS · 2011 to 2012
$47k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA030799NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA030801NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA031656NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA004294NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA04294NIDA NIH HHS T31 DA007281NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cues associated with rewards, such as food or drugs of abuse, can themselves acquire motivational properties. Acting as incentive stimuli, such cues can exert powerful control over motivated behavior, and in the case of cues associated with drugs, they can goad continued drug-seeking behavior and relapse. However, recent studies reviewed here suggest that there are large individual differences in the extent to which food and drug cues are attributed with incentive salience. Rats prone to approach reward cues (sign-trackers) attribute greater motivational value to discrete localizable cues and interoceptive cues than do rats less prone to approach reward cues (goal-trackers). In contrast, contextual cues appear to exert greater control over motivated behavior in goal-trackers than sign-trackers. It is possible to predict, therefore, before any experience with drugs, in which animals specific classes of drug cues will most likely reinstate drug-seeking behavior. The finding that different individuals may be sensitive to different triggers capable of motivating behavior and producing relapse suggests there may be different pathways to addiction, and has implications for thinking about individualized treatment. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'NIDA 40th Anniversary Issue'.

Indexed as

CuesIndividualityMotivationRewardAnimalsHumansRatsSubstance-Related DisordersAddictionCocaineConditioned approachConditioned motivationGoal-trackingIncentive saliencePavlovian conditioningSign-tracking

Identifiers

PMID23748094
PMCPMC3796005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.