Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23747930›Full record

ReviewFree radical biology & medicine2014

How do nutritional antioxidants really work: nucleophilic tone and para-hormesis versus free radical scavenging in vivo.

Henry J Forman, Kelvin J A Davies, Fulvio Ursini

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Free radical biology & medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 284 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
284citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
23.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

284 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 671 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. IMD-1 Protects SH-SY5Y Cells Against HNeurochemical research · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Urate as a COAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Update: Is exercise-induced oxidative stress a friend or foe?Sports medicine and health science · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

224 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Henry J FormanUniversity of California, Merced, 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, CA 95343, USA; Andrus Gerontology Center of the Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern, California, 3715 McClintock Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0191, USA.
Kelvin J A DaviesAndrus Gerontology Center of the Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern, California, 3715 McClintock Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0191, USA; Division of Molecular & Computational Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts, and Sciences, University of Southern California, 3715 McClintock Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0191, USA.
Fulvio UrsiniDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, Viale G. Colombo 3, I-35121, Padova, Italy. Electronic address: fulvio.ursini@unipd.it.
University of California, Merced · USUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

OXYGEN RADICAL TOXICITY AND RED CELL PROTEIN DEGRADATIONR01ES003598 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DAVIES, KELVIN J. A. · 1988 to 2017
$5.7M
Oxidative activation of Src in smoke-induced epithelial mesenchymal transitionR21ES020942 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI FORMAN, HENRY JAY · 2012 to 2013
$447k
Oxygen Radical Toxicity and Protein DegradationR56ES003598 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DAVIES, KELVIN J. A. · 2012 to 2012
$138k
OXYGEN RADICAL TOXICITY AND RED CELL PROTEIN DEGRADATIONR23ES003598 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DAVIES, KELVIN J. A. · 1985 to 1987
–
NIEHS NIH HHS ES003598NIEHS NIH HHS ES020942NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES003598NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES020942NIEHS NIH HHS R56 ES003598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present arguments for an evolution in our understanding of how antioxidants in fruits and vegetables exert their health-protective effects. There is much epidemiological evidence for disease prevention by dietary antioxidants and chemical evidence that such compounds react in one-electron reactions with free radicals in vitro. Nonetheless, kinetic constraints indicate that in vivo scavenging of radicals is ineffective in antioxidant defense. Instead, enzymatic removal of nonradical electrophiles, such as hydroperoxides, in two-electron redox reactions is the major antioxidant mechanism. Furthermore, we propose that a major mechanism of action for nutritional antioxidants is the paradoxical oxidative activation of the Nrf2 (NF-E2-related factor 2) signaling pathway, which maintains protective oxidoreductases and their nucleophilic substrates. This maintenance of "nucleophilic tone," by a mechanism that can be called "para-hormesis," provides a means for regulating physiological nontoxic concentrations of the nonradical oxidant electrophiles that boost antioxidant enzymes, and damage removal and repair systems (for proteins, lipids, and DNA), at the optimal levels consistent with good health.

Indexed as

Oxidative StressAnimalsAntioxidant Response ElementsAntioxidantsDietGene Expression RegulationGlutathioneHormesisHumansLipid PeroxidationNF-E2-Related Factor 2Reactive Oxygen SpeciesSuperoxide DismutaseVitamin EAntioxidantsGlutathioneNF-E2-Related Factor 2Reactive Oxygen SpeciesSuperoxide DismutaseVitamin Eantioxidant response elementAntioxidantsAREelectrophile response elementEpREglutathioneGlutathioneGSHKeap1/Nrf2Nrf2nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2Nucleophilic tonePeroxidasesRedox signalingSODsuperoxide dismutasethioredoxinTrx

Identifiers

PMID23747930
PMCPMC3852196
OpenAlexW2066472053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.