Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23747901›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)2013

Biomarkers of bipolar disorder: specific or shared with schizophrenia?

Frank Bellivier, Pierre Alexis Geoffroy, Jan Scott, Franck Schurhoff, Marion Leboyer, Bruno Etain

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How pharmacology can aid in the diagnosis of mental disorders.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Bipolar disorder risk geneJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Concepts and misconceptions regarding clinical staging models.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Frank BellivierInserm, U955, Psychiatrie genetique, Creteil, France. frank.bellivier@inserm.fr
Pierre Alexis Geoffroy
Jan Scott
Franck Schurhoff
Marion Leboyer
Bruno Etain

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kraepelin's observations of the differences in the course and outcome of dementia praecox and manic depression fundamentally influenced thinking about bipolar disorder (BP) and schizophrenia (SZ) for over a century. In modern times, there is increasing awareness that a greater understanding of the similarities between these two highly prevalent and disabling conditions can teach us as many lessons about the pathophysiology of severe mental disorders as does the pursuit of differentiating factors. We review publications on developmental, genetic, epidemiological, and outcome research that challenges the Kraepelian dichotomy. We highlight the increasing evidence of the overlap in genetic susceptibility. Neuro-developmental studies provide evidence of shared early pathological processes, whilst neurophysiological investigations also suggest that different genes may have a role in the development of both phenotypes. There is also evidence of overlapping neurocognitive phenotypes. It has become increasingly clear that a simple binary classification of these disorders represents an oversimplification. It may be more apposite to think in terms of genetic influences on six continuous symptom dimensions: neurobiological, cognitive, positive, negative, depressive and manic symptoms.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBipolar DisorderHumansSchizophreniaBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID23747901
PMCPMC5127822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.