Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23747348›Full record

ReviewBiochemical pharmacology2013

Genetic matters: thirty years of progress using mouse models in nicotinic research.

Michael J Marks

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael J MarksInstitute for Behavioral Genetics and Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA. Electronic address: marksm@colorado.edu.
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Project 3 University of Colorado, BoulderU19DA019375 · NIDA · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MARKS, MICHAEL J · 2005 to 2014
$8.3M
GENETICS OF NICOTINE TOLERANCE: ROLE OF RECEPTORSR01DA003194 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI MARKS, MICHAEL J · 1985 to 2013
$5.5M
Studies with Nicotinic Null Mutant MiceP30DA015663 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI MARKS, MICHAEL J · 2003 to 2013
$4.5M
ALPHA-CONOTOXIN MII--SELECTIVE NICOTINIC RECEPTOR PROBER01DA012242 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI WHITEAKER, PAUL · 1999 to 2011
$3.5M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA015663NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA15663NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA003194NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012242NIDA NIH HHS U19 DA019375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research update summarizes thirty years of studies on genetic influences on responses to the acute or chronic administration of nicotine. Early studies established that various inbred mice are differentially sensitive to the effects of the drug. Classical genetic analyses confirmed that nicotine effects on locomotion, body temperature and seizures are heritable. A significant inverse correlation between the locomotor and hypothermic effects and the density of nicotine binding sites suggested that differential expression α4β2-neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) mediated some of this genetic variability. Subsequent studies with α4 and β2 nAChR null (decreased sensitivity) and gain of function mutants (increased sensitivity) supports the role of the α4β2*nAChR subtype. However, null mutant mice still respond to nicotine, indicating that other nAChR subtypes also mediate these responses. Mice differing in initial sensitivity to nicotine also differ in tolerance development following chronic treatment: those mice that are initially more sensitive to nicotine develop tolerance at lower treatment doses than less sensitive mice, indicating that tolerance is an adaptive response to the effects of nicotine. In contrast, the sensitivity of mice to pre-pulse inhibition of acoustic startle response is correlated with the expression of α7-nAChR. While genetic variability in nAChR expression and function is an important factor contributing to differences in response to nicotine, the observations that altered activity of opioid, glutamate, and cannabinoid receptors among others also change nicotine sensitivity reinforces the proposal that the genetics of nicotine response is more complex than differences in nAChRs.

Indexed as

AnimalsGene Expression RegulationGenetic VariationNicotinePainReceptors, NicotinicNicotineReceptors, NicotinicChrnaChrnbgenes encoding α subunits of the nAChRgenes encoding β subunits of the nAChRKnockout micelong sleep miceLSMouse geneticsMutationsnAChRNicotinenicotinic acetylcholine receptorNicotinic acetylcholine receptorsShort sleep miceSS

Identifiers

PMID23747348
PMCPMC4329927
OpenAlexW2043742160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.