ArticleThe Journal of hand surgery2013
Comparison of in vitro motion and stability between techniques for index metacarpophalangeal joint radial collateral ligament reconstruction.
Article in The Journal of hand surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bilateral radial collateral ligament rupture in a shoemaker: A case report and brief literature review.Medicine · 2020Article
- Cadaveric Testing of a Novel Scapholunate Ligament Reconstruction.Journal of wrist surgery · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate a technique using interference screws to secure a tendon graft for reconstruction of the radial collateral ligament (RCL) of the index finger metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint. We hypothesized that this technique would provide equivalent stability and flexion as a 4-tunnel reconstruction.
methodsWe isolated the RCL in 17 cadaveric index fingers. A cyclic load was applied to the intact RCL across the MCP joint to assess flexion, ulnar deviation at neutral (UD 0), and ulnar deviation at 90° of MCP joint flexion (UD 90). The RCL was excised from its bony origin and insertion. We performed each reconstruction (4-tunnel and interference screw) sequentially on each specimen in a randomized order using a palmaris longus tendon graft. We repeated testing after each reconstruction and compared differences from the intact state between techniques using paired t-tests for all joint positions (flexion/UD 0/UD 90).
resultsThere was no statistically significant difference in UD 0 or UD 90 between the intact state and after interference screw reconstruction. Compared with the intact state, there was significantly less UD 0 and significantly more UD 90 after 4-tunnel reconstruction. There was no statistically significant difference between techniques when we compared changes in -UD 0 or UD 90. Change in flexion was statistically significantly different, which indicates that the interference screw technique better replicated intact MCP joint flexion compared with the 4-tunnel technique.
conclusionsInterference screw reconstruction of the index RCL provides stability comparable to 4-tunnel reconstruction and is less technically challenging. These results substantiate our clinical experience that the interference screw technique provides an optimal combination of stability and flexion at the index MCP joint. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Using an interference screw to reconstruct the index RCL is less challenging than 4-tunnel reconstruction and provides stability and range of motion that closely resemble the native MCP joint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.