ArticleEpidemics2013
Implications of within-farm transmission for network dynamics: consequences for the spread of avian influenza.
Article in Epidemics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling and assessing Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) spread, epidemiological control measures, and cost.PloS one · 2026Article
- The effect of temporal resolution and contact duration on Real-Time location system-based contact networks for confined feedlot cattle.Preventive veterinary medicine · 2025Article
- Analysis of within-pen and between-pen fenceline temporal contact networks in confined feedlot cattle.Preventive veterinary medicine · 2024Article
- Development of a transboundary model of livestock disease in Europe.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2022Article
- Article
- Assessing intrastate shipments from interstate data and expert opinion.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- Development of a Dissemination Platform for Spatiotemporal and Phylogenetic Analysis of Avian Infectious Bronchitis Virus.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- Role of Live-Duck Movement Networks in Transmission of Avian Influenza, France, 2016-2017.Emerging infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Article
- Analysing livestock network data for infectious disease control: an argument for routine data collection in emerging economies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Who acquires infection from whom and how? Disentangling multi-host and multi-mode transmission dynamics in the 'elimination' era.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017Review
- Complex responses to movement-based disease control: when livestock trading helps.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017Article
- Infectious disease transmission and contact networks in wildlife and livestock.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015Review
- A metapopulation model for highly pathogenic avian influenza: implications for compartmentalization as a control measure.Epidemiology and infection · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The importance of considering coupled interactions across multiple population scales has not previously been studied for highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in the British commercial poultry industry. By simulating the within-flock transmission of HPAI using a deterministic S-E-I-R model, and by incorporating an additional environmental class representing infectious faeces, we tracked the build-up of infectious faeces within a poultry house over time. A measure of the transmission risk (TR) was computed for each farm by linking the amount of infectious faeces present each day of an outbreak with data describing the daily on-farm visit schedules for a major British catching company. Larger flocks tended to have greater levels of these catching-team visits. However, where density-dependent contact was assumed, faster outbreak detection (according to an assumed mortality threshold) led to a decreased opportunity for catching-team visits to coincide with an outbreak. For this reason, maximum TR-levels were found for mid-range flock sizes (~25,000-35,000 birds). When assessing all factors simultaneously using multivariable linear regression on the simulated outputs, those related to the pattern of catching-team visits had the largest effect on TR, with the most important movement-related factor depending on the mode of transmission. Using social network analysis on a further database to inform a measure of between-farm connectivity, we identified a large fraction of farms (28%) that had both a high TR and a high potential impact at the between farm level. Our results have counter-intuitive implications for between-farm spread that could not be predicted based on flock size alone, and together with further knowledge of the relative importance of transmission risk and impact, could have implications for improved targeting of control measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.