ArticleBiophysical journal2013
Structural flexibility of CaV1.2 and CaV2.2 I-II proximal linker fragments in solution.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of Force Fields and Water Models in Protein Folding and Unfolding Dynamics.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Voltage-dependent calcium channels (CaV) enable the inward flow of calcium currents for a wide range of cells. CaV1 and CaV2 subtype α1 subunits form the conducting pore using four repeated membrane domains connected by intracellular linkers. The domain I-II linker connects to the membrane gate (IS6), forming an α-helix, and is bound to the CaVβ subunit. Previous studies indicated that this region may or may not form a continuous helix depending on the CaV subtype, thereby modulating channel activation and inactivation properties. Here, we used small-angle x-ray scattering and ensemble modeling analysis to investigate the solution structure of these linkers, extending from the membrane domain and including the CaVβ-binding site, called the proximal linker (PL). The results demonstrate that the CaV1.2 PL is more flexible than the CaV2.2 PL, the flexibility is intrinsic and not dependent on CaVβ binding, and the flexibility can be most easily explained by the presence of conserved glycines. Our analysis also provides a robust example of investigating protein domains in which flexibility plays an essential role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.