Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23746460›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2013

Toward a cross-species understanding of empathy.

Jaak Panksepp, Jules B Panksepp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Amygdala and Politics.Brain sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Distinct oxytocin signaling pathways synergistically mediate rescue-like behavior in mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jaak PankseppDepartment of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6520, USA. jpanksepp@vetmed.wsu.edu
Jules B Panksepp

Funding

NEUROSCIENCE TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007507 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HALLORAN, MARY C · 1985 to 2017
$9.3M
Vicarious Neural Activity, Genetic Differences and Social Fear LearningF32MH096475 · NIMH · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI PANKSEPP, JULES B · 2011 to 2014
$162k
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007507NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH096475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although signs of empathy have now been well documented in non-human primates, only during the past few years have systematic observations suggested that a primal form of empathy exists in rodents. Thus, the study of empathy in animals has started in earnest. Here we review recent studies indicating that rodents are able to share states of fear, and highlight how affective neuroscience approaches to the study of primary-process emotional systems can help to delineate how primal empathy is constituted in mammalian brains. Cross-species evolutionary approaches to understanding the neural circuitry of emotional 'contagion' or 'resonance' between nearby animals, together with the underlying neurochemistries, may help to clarify the origins of human empathy.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsBrainEmotionsEmpathyHumansNeural PathwaysSocial Behavioraffective neuroscienceanterior cingulate cortexcontagionemotionreciprocityrodentsocial behavior

Identifiers

PMID23746460
PMCPMC3839944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.