ArticleJournal of basic and clinical medicine2012
Evaluation of Tumor Cell Response to Hyperthermia with Bioluminescent Imaging.
Article in Journal of basic and clinical medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simvastatin Attenuated Tumor Growth in Different Pancreatic Tumor Animal Models.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHyperthermia is used in combination with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy in the treatment of various types of cancer. Currently, the tumor cell response to hyperthermia is determined largely based on the size reduction of tumor mass, which is insensitive.
methodsWe tested the feasibility of bioluminescent imaging (BLI) in evaluation of the tumor cell response to hyperthermia by exposing luciferase-expressing MDA-MB-231-luc human breast cancer cells to high temperature (43 °C) for 10 minutes to 2 hours. The tumor cells were the imaged and the light signal generated by the tumor cells was quantified with BLI. To validate its usefulness, the light signal intensity was comparatively analyzed with the tumor cell clonogenicity and cell viability, which were measured with classic clonogenic and MTT assays.
resultsThe light signal intensity determined by BLI was closely correlated with the absolute number of viable cells as well as the cell viability measured with the traditional MTT assay under normal culture condition. Relative to the clonogenicity of tumor cells after exposure to hyperthermia, however, BLI underestimated, while MTT assay overestimated the cell viability. Difference in the interpretation of tumor cell clonogenic ability following hyperthermia with BLI, MTT dye, and clonogenic assay may be due to the different mechanisms of the three measurements as well as the fact that hyperthermia can induce cell damage at levels of both transient and permanent.
conclusionsBLI is sensitive, convenient, and potentially valuable in the evaluation and monitoring of tumor cell response to treatments including hyperthermia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23745173PMC3671621W2142378503What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.