ArticleGastrointestinal cancer research : GCR2013
Alternate dosing of cetuximab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Article in Gastrointestinal cancer research : GCR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vaccine antibodies against a synthetic epidermal growth factor variant enhance the antitumor effects of inhibitors targeting the MAPK/ERK and PI3K/Akt pathways.Translational oncology · 2024Article
- Real-world comparison between weekly versus biweekly dosing of cetuximab for metastatic colorectal cancer.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2023Article
- Heteronemin and Tetrac Induce Anti-Proliferation by Blocking EGFR-Mediated Signaling in Colorectal Cancer Cells.Marine drugs · 2022Article
- Refining Glioblastoma Surgery through the Use of Intra-Operative Fluorescence Imaging Agents.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Unraveling the complexity of therapeutic drug monitoring for monoclonal antibody therapies to individualize dose in oncology.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2021Review
- Efficacy and clinical monitoring strategies for immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted cytokine immunotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer.Cytokine & growth factor reviews · 2019Review
- Current targeted therapies in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a review.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2016Review
- Mutations of KRAS/NRAS/BRAF predict cetuximab resistance in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Cortactin expression confers a more malignant phenotype to gastric cancer SGC-7901 cells.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Article
- Radiolabeled Cetuximab Conjugates for EGFR Targeted Cancer Diagnostics and Therapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014Article
- Molecularly targeted drugs for metastatic colorectal cancer.Drug design, development and therapy · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany chemotherapeutic regimens used to treat colorectal cancer (CRC), including 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in combination with irinotecan (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), are administered on an every-other-week (q2w) dosing schedule. Chemotherapy in combination with a monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed toward the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has emerged as an effective treatment option. There are currently 2 anti-EGFR mAbs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration: cetuximab and panitumumab. Mutations of KRAS, a downstream protein in the EGFR pathway, predict resistance to EGFR mAbs. Thus, cetuximab and panitumumab are indicated for patients without a KRAS mutation (KRAS wild-type). Whereas panitumumab is approved on a q2w dosing schedule, cetuximab is approved as a weekly dose. However, only cetuximab is approved with FOLFIRI for frontline metastatic CRC, whereas panitumumab is approved for third-line. Because concomitant therapies are often administered q2w, the weekly dosing of cetuximab results in additional medical office visits.
designSeveral studies have assessed the safety and efficacy of cetuximab q2w. For this review, a comprehensive literature search of studies evaluating cetuximab q2w dosing was conducted. Safety and efficacy results of these trials and retrospective analyses were summarized and reviewed.
resultsIn general, results with cetuximab q2w were comparable to those obtained with the weekly regimen.
conclusionThese data suggest that for patients for whom weekly treatment with cetuximab presents a substantial burden to their quality of life, q2w dosing of cetuximab is a viable treatment option with a benefit:risk profile similar to that of the weekly regimen.
Identifiers
23745159PMC3674463W161051388What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.