Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23744945›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2013

Stepwise evolution of essential centromere function in a Drosophila neogene.

Benjamin D Ross, Leah Rosin, Andreas W Thomae, Mary Alice Hiatt, Danielle Vermaak, Aida Flor A de la Cruz, Axel Imhof, Barbara G Mellone, Harmit S Malik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sex-biased duplicates are rapidly generated duringbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. HP6/Umbrea is dispensable for viability and fertility, suggesting essentiality of newly evolved genes is rare.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Benjamin D RossMolecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Leah Rosin
Andreas W Thomae
Mary Alice Hiatt
Danielle Vermaak
Aida Flor A de la Cruz
Axel Imhof
Barbara G Mellone
Harmit S Malik

Funding

INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN GENOMIC SCIENCEST32HG000035 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Bruce Colston Trapnell · 1995 to 2026
$24.2M
Genetic Conflict Shapes Centromeres and HeterochromatinR01GM074108 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MALIK, HARMIT S. · 2005 to 2022
$6.1M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000035NHGRI NIH HHS T32HG000035NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074108NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM074108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionarily young genes that serve essential functions represent a paradox; they must perform a function that either was not required until after their birth or was redundant with another gene. How young genes rapidly acquire essential function is largely unknown. We traced the evolutionary steps by which the Drosophila gene Umbrea acquired an essential role in chromosome segregation in D. melanogaster since the gene's origin less than 15 million years ago. Umbrea neofunctionalization occurred via loss of an ancestral heterochromatin-localizing domain, followed by alterations that rewired its protein interaction network and led to species-specific centromere localization. Our evolutionary cell biology approach provides temporal and mechanistic detail about how young genes gain essential function. Such innovations may constantly alter the repertoire of centromeric proteins in eukaryotes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCentromereChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGene DuplicationGenes, InsectMolecular Sequence DataChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDrosophila ProteinsHP6 protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID23744945
PMCPMC4119826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.