ArticleCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2013
Analysis of expression of membrane-bound tumor markers in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: paving the way for molecular imaging.
Article in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The influence of insulin-like Growth Factor-1-Receptor expression and endocrine treatment on clinical outcome of postmenopausal hormone receptor positive breast cancer patients: A Dutch TEAM substudy analysis.Molecular oncology · 2016Trial
- Automated synthesis and dosimetry of 6-deoxy-6-[(18)F]fluoro-D-fructose (6-[(18)F]FDF): a radiotracer for imaging of GLUT5 in breast cancer.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAchieving radicality during breast conserving surgery for pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast and invasive cancer surrounded by DCIS is challenging. Molecular imaging holds promise here, when applied as a tool for image-guided surgery of DCIS.
methodsTissue microarrays containing 24 pure DCIS and 63 DCIS with adjacent invasive breast cancer cases were stained by immunohistochemistry for a panel of membrane-bound targets.
resultsGLUT1 expression was present in 60.9%, IGF1-R in 55.2% HER2 in 28.7%, MET in 18.4%, EGFR in 16.1%, CD44v6 in 69%, carbonic anhydrase XII (CAXII) in 24.1% and Mammaglobin in 14.9% of DCIS cases. No expression differences between pure DCIS and DCIS with adjacent cancer were observed. Further, HER2 and EGFR expression were correlated with high grade DCIS (p=0.001) and CAXII with low grade DCIS (p=0.027). A putative panel containing HER2, EGFR, GLUT1 and IGF1-R had a detection rate of 90.2% for DCIS and 78.3% for adjacent breast cancer.
conclusionsWe found that membrane-bound targets are more frequently expressed in DCIS than in invasive breast cancer, but that single membrane proteins are too infrequently expressed to serve as single imaging targets for the detection of DCIS. However, a panel of markers consisting of IGF1-R, CD44v6, GLUT1, EGFR, and HER2 was found to be positive in 96.3% of DICS based on marker expression in the adjacent invasive breast cancer as described earlier. This implies that detection of DCIS based on marker expression in the adjacent invasive breast cancer during breast conserving surgery should be possible with a panel of molecular imaging tracers targeting CD44v6, GLUT1, HER2, IGF1-R, and EGFR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.