Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23744089›Full record

ArticleHNO2013

[Perceptual and automatic voice and speech analysis of chronic laryngitis and T1 vocal cord cancer].

B Bartke, T Haderlein, M Döllinger, E Nöth, S Graf, U Eysholdt, A Ziethe

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in HNO, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B BartkeLehrstuhl für Mustererkennung (Informatik 5), Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland.
T Haderlein
M Döllinger
E Nöth
S Graf
U Eysholdt
A Ziethe
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with chronic laryngitis and T1 vocal cord cancer were compared using perceptual and text-based objective voice and speech analyses in order to determine which group is more affected in its ability to communicate and whether a distinction between the two pathologies is possible. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn all, 13 patients with histologically proven chronic laryngitis and 13 patients with T1 vocal cord cancer were compared perceptually by five speech therapists on the basis of seven criteria and objectively by a speech recognition system and prosodic analysis.

resultsBoth, the data of the five speech therapists and the results of the automatic analysis revealed no significant differences between the two patient groups.

conclusionA distinction between chronic laryngitis and T1 vocal cord carcinoma by mere voice and speech analysis is not possible, because the patient groups do not show significant differences in their voice quality.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansLaryngeal NeoplasmsLaryngitisMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySound SpectrographySpeech Production MeasurementVocal CordsVoice DisordersVoice Quality

Identifiers

PMID23744089
OpenAlexW162467533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.