Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23743825›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2013

Candidate biomarkers for genetic and clinicopathological diagnosis of endometrial cancer.

Kouji Banno, Yuya Nogami, Iori Kisu, Megumi Yanokura, Kiyoko Umene, Kenta Masuda, Yusuke Kobayashi, Wataru Yamagami, Nobuyuki Susumu, Daisuke Aoki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. miR-27a acts as an oncogene to regulate endometrial cancer progression by targeting USP46.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kouji BannoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Keio University, Shinanomachi 35 Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan. kbanno@z7.keio.jp.
Yuya Nogami
Iori Kisu
Megumi Yanokura
Kiyoko Umene
Kenta Masuda
Yusuke Kobayashi
Wataru Yamagami
Nobuyuki Susumu
Daisuke Aoki

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent increase in the frequency of endometrial cancer has emphasized the need for accurate diagnosis and improved treatment. The current diagnosis is still based on conventional pathological indicators, such as clinical stage, tumor differentiation, invasion depth and vascular invasion. However, the genetic mechanisms underlying endometrial cancer have gradually been determined, due to developments in molecular biology, leading to the possibility of new methods of diagnosis and treatment planning. New candidate biomarkers for endometrial cancer include those for molecular epigenetic mutations, such as microRNAs. These biomarkers may permit earlier detection of endometrial cancer and prediction of outcomes and are likely to contribute to future personalized therapy for endometrial cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDNA MethylationEndometrial NeoplasmsEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMicroRNAsBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID23743825
PMCPMC3709777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.