SynthesisHerz2013
Cabergoline use and risk of fibrosis and insufficiency of cardiac valves. Meta-analysis of observational studies.
Synthesis in Herz, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- A real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of cardiac, endocrine, and neurological adverse events associated with cabergoline: a disproportionality study.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026Article
- Microdosing psychedelics and the risk of cardiac fibrosis and valvulopathy: Comparison to known cardiotoxins.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2024Review
- Incidence of Cabergoline-Associated Valvulopathy in Primary Care Patients With Prolactinoma Using Hard Cardiac Endpoints.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2021Article
- Echocardiography and monitoring patients receiving dopamine agonist therapy for hyperprolactinaemia: a joint position statement of the British Society of Echocardiography, the British Heart Valve Society and the Society for Endocrinology.Echo research and practice · 2019Article
- Prospective, long-term study of the effect of cabergoline on valvular status in patients with prolactinoma and idiopathic hyperprolactinemia.Endocrine · 2017Article
- Pulmonary Artery Occlusion and Mediastinal Fibrosis in a Patient on Dopamine Agonist Treatment for Hyperprolactinemia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2017Article
- Non-Ergot Dopamine Agonists Do Not Increase the Risk of Heart Failure in Parkinson's Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2016Article
- Side effects of a dopamine agonist therapy for Parkinson's disease: a mini-review of clinical pharmacology.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2016Review
- The recommendations of Chinese Parkinson's disease and movement disorder society consensus on therapeutic management of Parkinson's disease.Translational neurodegeneration · 2016Review
- USP8: a novel therapeutic target for Cushing's disease.Endocrine · 2015Review
- Second Attempt of Cabergoline Withdrawal in Patients with Prolactinomas after a Failed First Attempt: Is it Worthwhile?Frontiers in endocrinology · 2015Article
- Cabergoline treatment in acromegaly: cons.Endocrine · 2014Article
- Controversial issues in the management of hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas - An overview by the Neuroendocrinology Department of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism.Archives of endocrinology and metabolismReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTherapy with ergot-derivative dopamine agonists (ergot-DAs) is suspected to cause or promote the development of insufficiency and regurgitation in previously normal cardiac valves. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to determine whether administration of cabergoline, i.e., an ergot-DA used to treat Parkinson's disease (PD) or hyperprolactinemia, is associated with an increased risk of valve regurgitation compared with pharmacological regimens not comprising ergot-DAs or with no therapy.
methodsObservational studies were selected from the Pubmed and Embase databases. Studies had to have assessed the prevalence, odds, or risk of cardiac valve regurgitation in patients who underwent chronic treatment with cabergoline for PD or hyperprolactinemia compared with patients with the same diseases whose therapy did not include cabergoline or another ergot-DA. Separate meta-analyses were performed for PD and hyperprolactinemia patients.
resultsOn the basis of five studies, 634 PD patients were taking cabergoline, while 9,120 PD patients were treated with dopa/dopamine decarboxylase inhibitor, alone or associated with a non-ergot DA. Valvular regurgitation of any degree - at one cardiac valve or more - was more frequent in PD patients who were taking cabergoline compared to those treated with a non-ergot DA agent or not treated with any dopamine agonist [adjusted (inverse variance: iv) odds ratio: 7.25 95 % CI: 3.71-14.18; p < 0.0001]. On the other hand, pooled data from seven studies showed that patients with hyperprolactinemia who were taking cabergoline (n = 444) exhibited significantly higher odds of mild- to-moderate tricuspid regurgitation compared to untreated controls (n = 954) [adjusted (iv) odds ratio: 1.92 95 % CI:1.34-2.73; p = 0.0003]. No significant differences in mitral or aortic valve regurgitation were detected between hyperprolactinemic patients taking cabergoline and controls.
conclusionIn PD patients, the risk of valvular regurgitation of any grade involving one or more cardiac valves was proven to be strongly associated with cabergoline treatment. Furthermore, based on our results, hyperprolactinemic patients taking cabergoline have an increased risk of mild-to-moderate tricuspid valve regurgitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.