Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23742715›Full record

ArticleObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2013

Will reducing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption reduce obesity? Evidence supporting conjecture is strong, but evidence when testing effect is weak.

K A Kaiser, J M Shikany, K D Keating, D B Allison

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02702440 (Effect of Liquid Versus Solid Calories on Body Weight), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02702440 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Liquid Versus Solid Calories on Body Weight: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Controlled Feeding Trials

TypeobservationalSponsorJohn SievenpiperRan2015 to 2016Enrolled1ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Chronic Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases, Prediabetic StateArmsLiquid calories from sugars
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose with incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Determinants of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in young children: a systematic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. A systematic review investigating interventions that can help reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in children leading to changes in body fatness.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K A KaiserOffice of Energetics, Dean's Office, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA.
J M Shikany
K D Keating
D B Allison

Funding

Why is the prevalence of obesity so high in U.S. Southern States? Regional predictors of BMI and obesity treatment response.P30DK056336 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Gareth R Dutton · 2000 to 2026
$31.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056336NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK056336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We provide arguments to the debate question and update a previous meta-analysis with recently published studies on effects of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) on body weight/composition indices (BWIs). We abstracted data from randomized controlled trials examining effects of consumption of SSBs on BWIs. Six new studies met these criteria: (i) human trials, (ii) ≥ 3 weeks duration, (iii) random assignment to conditions differing only in consumption of SSBs and (iv) including a BWI outcome. Updated meta-analysis of a total of seven studies that added SSBs to persons' diets showed dose-dependent increases in weight. Updated meta-analysis of eight studies attempting to reduce SSB consumption showed an equivocal effect on BWIs in all randomized subjects. When limited to subjects overweight at baseline, meta-analysis showed a significant effect of roughly 0.25 standard deviations (more weight loss/less weight gain) relative to controls. Evidence to date is equivocal in showing that decreasing SSB consumption will reduce the prevalence of obesity. Although new evidence suggests that an effect may yet be demonstrable in some populations, the integrated effect size estimate remains very small and of equivocal statistical significance. Problems in this research area and suggestions for future research are highlighted.

Indexed as

BeveragesObesityDietary SucroseEnergy IntakeHumansDietary SucroseObesityrandomized controlled trialssoft drinksweight loss.

Identifiers

PMID23742715
PMCPMC3929296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.