Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23741415›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

In vivo visualization of Notch1 proteolysis reveals the heterogeneity of Notch1 signaling activity in the mouse cochlea.

Zhiyong Liu, Zhenyi Liu, Bradley J Walters, Thomas Owen, Raphael Kopan, Jian Zuo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. In Vivo Interplay between p27Cell reports · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Spontaneous regeneration of cochlear supporting cells after neonatal ablation ensures hearing in the adult mouse.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Overview of genetic tools and techniques to study Notch signaling in mice.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhiyong LiuDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.
Zhenyi Liu
Bradley J Walters
Thomas Owen
Raphael Kopan
Jian Zuo
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
BIOCHEMICAL AND GENETIC ANALYSIS OF NOTCH SIGNALINGR01GM055479 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KOPAN, RAPHAEL, WEIRAUCH, MATTHEW TYSON · 1996 to 2021
$6.4M
GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MAMMALIAN HEARING SENSITIVITYR01DC006471 · NIDCD · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI ZUO, JIAN · 2004 to 2013
$3.5M
ROLE OF NOTCH AND KIDNEY DEVELOPMENTR01DK066408 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KOPAN, RAPHAEL · 2004 to 2012
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA21765NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NIDCD NIH HHS DC06471NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006471NIDDK NIH HHS DK066408NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK066408NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM055479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanosensory hair cells (HCs) and surrounding supporting cells (SCs) in the mouse cochlea are important for hearing and are derived from the same prosensory progenitors. Notch1 signaling plays dual but contrasting and age-dependent roles in mouse cochlear development: early lateral induction and subsequent lateral inhibition. However, it has been difficult to directly visualize mouse cochlear cells experiencing various levels of Notch1 activity at single cell resolution. Here, we characterized two knock-in mouse lines, Notch1(Cre (Low)/+) and Notch1(Cre (High)/+) , with different Cre recombinase activities, that can detect Notch1 receptor proteolysis or Notch1 activity at high and low thresholds, respectively. Using both lines together with a highly sensitive Cre reporter line, we showed that Notch1 activity is nearly undetectable during lateral induction but increases to medium and high levels during lateral inhibition. Furthermore, we found that within the neonatal organ of Corti, the vast majority of cells that experience Notch1 activity were SCs not HCs, suggesting that HCs kept undetectable Notch1 activity during the entire lineage development. Furthermore, among SC subtypes, ∼85-99% of Deiters' and outer pillar cells but only ∼19-38% of inner pillar cells experience medium and high levels of Notch1 activity. Our results demonstrate that Notch1 activity is highly heterogeneous: 1) between lateral induction and inhibition; 2) between HC and SC lineages; 3) among different SC subtypes; 4) among different cells within each SC subtype. Such heterogeneity should elucidate how the development of the cochclear sensory epithelium is precisely controlled and how HC regeneration can be best achieved in postnatal cochleae.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAllelesAnimalsCochleaGene ExpressionGenes, ReporterHair Cells, AuditoryLabyrinth Supporting CellsMiceMice, TransgenicProteolysisReceptor, Notch1Receptor, Notch1

Identifiers

PMID23741415
PMCPMC3669271
OpenAlexW2163241651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.