Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23741334›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Effects of adhesion dynamics and substrate compliance on the shape and motility of crawling cells.

Falko Ziebert, Igor S Aranson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nonlinear Stability in a Free Boundary Model of Active Locomotion.Archive for rational mechanics and analysis · 2026
    Article
  3. Computational models in directed cell migration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Mesenchymal cell migration on one-dimensional micropatterns.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. 1D micro-nanopatterned integrin ligand surfaces for directed cell movement.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Tools for computational analysis of moving boundary problems in cellular mechanobiology.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  16. Stick-slip model for actin-driven cell protrusions, cell polarization, and crawling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Reversible elastic phase field approach and application to cell monolayers.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2020
    Article
  18. Active inter-cellular forces in collective cell motility.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Falko ZiebertPhysikalisches Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg, Germany.
Igor S Aranson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational modeling of eukaryotic cells moving on substrates is an extraordinarily complex task: many physical processes, such as actin polymerization, action of motors, formation of adhesive contacts concomitant with both substrate deformation and recruitment of actin etc., as well as regulatory pathways are intertwined. Moreover, highly nontrivial cell responses emerge when the substrate becomes deformable and/or heterogeneous. Here we extended a computational model for motile cell fragments, based on an earlier developed phase field approach, to account for explicit dynamics of adhesion site formation, as well as for substrate compliance via an effective elastic spring. Our model displays steady motion vs. stick-slip transitions with concomitant shape oscillations as a function of the actin protrusion rate, the substrate stiffness, and the rates of adhesion. Implementing a step in the substrate's elastic modulus, as well as periodic patterned surfaces exemplified by alternating stripes of high and low adhesiveness, we were able to reproduce the correct motility modes and shape phenomenology found experimentally. We also predict the following nontrivial behavior: the direction of motion of cells can switch from parallel to perpendicular to the stripes as a function of both the adhesion strength and the width ratio of adhesive to non-adhesive stripes.

Indexed as

Cell MovementCell ShapeModels, BiologicalActinsCell AdhesionCells, CulturedElastic ModulusHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHumansKeratinocytesMarine ToxinsMyosinsOligopeptidesOxazolesSurface PropertiesActinsarginyl-glycyl-aspartic acidblebbistatincalyculin AHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsMarine ToxinsMyosinsOligopeptidesOxazoles

Identifiers

PMID23741334
PMCPMC3669322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.