Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23741002›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2013

Susceptibility and pathogenesis of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) to heterologous and homologous rabies viruses.

April D Davis, Jodie A Jarvis, Craig E Pouliott, Shannon M D Morgan, Robert J Rudd

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Oral Sampling of Little Brown BatAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  2. Rabies virus in white-nosed coatis (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Virulence mismatches in index hosts shape the outcomes of cross-species transmission.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Natural exposure of bats in Grenada to rabies virus.Infection ecology & epidemiology · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

April D DavisRabies Laboratory, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Slingerlands, New York, USA. add02@health.state.ny.us
Jodie A Jarvis
Craig E Pouliott
Shannon M D Morgan
Robert J Rudd
Wadsworth Center · USAlbany State University · US

Funding

Rabies virus maintenance in bat populationsK08AI085031 · NIAID · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI DAVIS, APRIL DAWN · 2010 to 2013
$423k
NIAID NIH HHS 5K08AI085031NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI085031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabies virus (RABV) maintenance in bats is not well understood. Big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus), little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus), and Mexican free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) are the most common bats species in the United States. These colonial bat species also have the most frequent contact with humans and domestic animals. However, the silver-haired bat (Lasionycteris noctivagans) RABV is associated with the majority of human rabies virus infections in the United States and Canada. This is of interest because silver-haired bats are more solitary bats with infrequent human interaction. Our goal was to determine the likelihood of a colonial bat species becoming infected with and transmitting a heterologous RABV. To ascertain the potential of heterologous RABV infection in colonial bat species, little brown bats were inoculated with a homologous RABV or one of two heterologous RABVs. Additionally, to determine if the route of exposure influenced the disease process, bats were inoculated either intramuscularly (i.m.) or subcutaneously (s.c.) with a homologous or heterologous RABV. Our results demonstrate that intramuscular inoculation results in a more rapid progression of disease onset, whereas the incubation time in bats inoculated s.c. is significantly longer. Additionally, cross protection was not consistently achieved in bats previously inoculated with a heterologous RABV following a challenge with a homologous RABV 6 months later. Finally, bats that developed rabies following s.c. inoculation were significantly more likely to shed virus in their saliva and demonstrated increased viral dissemination. In summary, bats inoculated via the s.c. route are more likely to shed virus, thus increasing the likelihood of transmission.

Indexed as

AnimalsChiropteraDisease SusceptibilityRabiesRabies virusVirus Shedding

Identifiers

PMID23741002
PMCPMC3754046
OpenAlexW2015985276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.