Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23740766›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013

Foam dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers.

Jo C Dumville, Sohan Deshpande, Susan O'Meara, Katharine Speak

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Advanced Wound Care Strategies in Patients with NSTIs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Selection of Appropriate Wound Dressing for Various Wounds.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Diabetic foot syndrome].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2016
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jo C DumvilleDepartment of Nursing,Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester,UK. jo.dumville@manchester.ac.uk.
Sohan Deshpande
Susan O'Meara
Katharine Speak
Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFoot ulcers in people with diabetes are a prevalent and serious global health issue. Dressings form a key part of ulcer treatment, with clinicians and patients having many different types to choose from. A clear and current overview of current evidence is required to facilitate decision-making regarding dressing use.

objectivesThe review aimed to evaluate the effects of foam wound dressings on the healing of foot ulcers in people with diabetes. SEARCH

methodsFor this first update we searched the following databases the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register; The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE; and EBSCO CINAHL in April 2013. There were no restrictions based on language or date of publication. SELECTION CRITERIA: Published or unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects on ulcer healing of one or more foam wound dressings in the treatment of foot ulcers in people with diabetes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently performed study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction. MAIN

resultsWe included six studies (157 participants) in this review. Meta analysis of two studies indicated that foam dressings do not promote the healing of diabetic foot ulcers compared with basic wound contact dressings (RR 2.03, 95%CI 0.91 to 4.55). Pooled data from two studies comparing foam and alginate dressing found no statistically significant difference in ulcer healing (RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.44). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of diabetic foot ulcers healed when foam dressings were compared with hydrocolloid (matrix) dressings. All included studies were small and/or had limited follow-up times. AUTHORS'

conclusionsCurrently there is no research evidence to suggest that foam wound dressings are more effective in healing foot ulcers in people with diabetes than other types of dressing however all trials in this field are very small. Decision makers may wish to consider aspects such as dressing cost and the wound management properties offered by each dressing type e.g. exudate management.

Indexed as

Wound HealingAerosolsBandagesDiabetic FootHumansPolyurethanesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAerosolsPolyurethanes

Identifiers

PMID23740766
PMCPMC7111297
OpenAlexW1613018511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.