SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013
Foam dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dressings and topical agents containing hyaluronic acid for chronic wound healing.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Skin grafting and tissue replacement for treating foot ulcers in people with diabetes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Dressings for treating foot ulcers in people with diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of octenidine wound gel in the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers in comparison to modern wound dressings.International wound journal · 2016Trial
- Chronic Wound Healing: Research Advances from Pathological Mechanisms to Natural Herbal Active Ingredients and Material Delivery Systems.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Progressive Hydrogel Applications in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Management: Phase-Dependent Healing Strategies.Polymers · 2025Review
- Advanced Wound Care Strategies in Patients with NSTIs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Assessment framework for the selection of a potential interactive dressing material for diabetic foot ulcer.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Comparative study of various dressing techniques in diabetic foot ulcers in the Indian population: a single-center experience.International journal of diabetes in developing countries · 2023Article
- Bilayer Hydrogels for Wound Dressing and Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2022Review
- Antibacterial-Integrated Collagen Wound Dressing for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers: An Evidence-Based Review of Clinical Studies.Polymers · 2020Review
- Selection of Appropriate Wound Dressing for Various Wounds.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- First-Line Interactive Wound Dressing Update: A Comprehensive Review of the Evidence.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- What factors influence community wound care in the UK? A focus group study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Co-delivery of deferoxamine and hydroxysafflor yellow A to accelerate diabetic wound healing via enhanced angiogenesis.Drug delivery · 2018Article
- [Diabetic foot syndrome].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2016Article
- Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Chronic Wounds: The Spectrum from Basic to Advanced Therapy.Advances in wound care · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFoot ulcers in people with diabetes are a prevalent and serious global health issue. Dressings form a key part of ulcer treatment, with clinicians and patients having many different types to choose from. A clear and current overview of current evidence is required to facilitate decision-making regarding dressing use.
objectivesThe review aimed to evaluate the effects of foam wound dressings on the healing of foot ulcers in people with diabetes. SEARCH
methodsFor this first update we searched the following databases the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register; The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE; and EBSCO CINAHL in April 2013. There were no restrictions based on language or date of publication. SELECTION CRITERIA: Published or unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects on ulcer healing of one or more foam wound dressings in the treatment of foot ulcers in people with diabetes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently performed study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction. MAIN
resultsWe included six studies (157 participants) in this review. Meta analysis of two studies indicated that foam dressings do not promote the healing of diabetic foot ulcers compared with basic wound contact dressings (RR 2.03, 95%CI 0.91 to 4.55). Pooled data from two studies comparing foam and alginate dressing found no statistically significant difference in ulcer healing (RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.44). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of diabetic foot ulcers healed when foam dressings were compared with hydrocolloid (matrix) dressings. All included studies were small and/or had limited follow-up times. AUTHORS'
conclusionsCurrently there is no research evidence to suggest that foam wound dressings are more effective in healing foot ulcers in people with diabetes than other types of dressing however all trials in this field are very small. Decision makers may wish to consider aspects such as dressing cost and the wound management properties offered by each dressing type e.g. exudate management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.