SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013
Deliberate hypotension with propofol under anaesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS).
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deliberate hypotension with propofol under anaesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Propofol use in newborns and children: is it safe? A systematic review.Jornal de pediatriaPooled it
- Impact of Controlled Induced Hypotension on Cognitive Functions of Patients Undergoing Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016Trial
- Intravenous clonidine as a part of balanced anaesthesia for controlled hypotension in functional endoscopic sinus surgery: A randomised controled trial.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2017Article
- Effect of controlled hypotension on regional cerebral oxygen saturation during rhinoplasty: a prospective study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2016Article
- Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery.GMS current topics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery · 2015Review
- O2 supplementation to secure the near-infrared spectroscopy determined brain and muscle oxygenation in vascular surgical patients: a presentation of 100 cases.Frontiers in physiology · 2014Article
- Evaluation of the efficacy of desflurane with or without labetalol for hypotensive anesthesia in middle ear microsurgery.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFunctional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a minimally invasive technique that is used to treat chronic sinusitis. Small bleeding areas can reduce operative visibility and result in destruction of surrounding structures. Deliberate hypotension (lowering the mean arterial blood pressure to between 50 and 65 mm Hg in normotensive patients) using a range of pharmacological agents during general anaesthesia reduces blood loss in many operations.
objectivesWe aimed to compare the use of the intravenous anaesthetic agent propofol versus other techniques for deliberate hypotension during FESS with regard to blood loss and operative conditions. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1950 to April 2012), EMBASE (1980 to April 2012), LILACS (1982 to April 2012) and ISI Web of Science (1946 to April 2012). We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and conference proceedings and contacted the authors of included trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted to compare propofol with other techniques. Our primary outcome was total blood loss (TBL). Other outcomes included surgical field quality, operation time, mortality within 24 hour, complications and failure to reach target blood pressure. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted details of trial methodology and outcome data from reports of all trials considered eligible for inclusion. All analyses were made on an intention-to-treat basis where possible. When I(2) was < 40% and the P value from the Chi(2) test was > 0.10, we pooled data by using the fixed-effect model. Otherwise we pooled data by using the random-effects model. MAIN
resultsWe included four studies with 278 participants in the review. Deliberate hypotension with propofol did not decrease TBL (millilitres) when compared with inhalation anaesthetics in either children or adults. Propofol improved the quality of the surgical field by less than one category on a scale from 0 (no bleeding) to 5 (severe bleeding) (mean difference (MD) 0.64 better with propofol, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37 to 0.91 better), but no difference in operation time was reported. Failure to lower blood pressure to target was less common in the propofol group (relative risk of failure with propofol (RR) 0.24, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.66). AUTHORS'
conclusionsUsing propofol to achieve deliberate hypotension may improve the surgical field, but the effect is small. Deliberate hypotension with propofol did not decrease TBL and operation time. RCTs with good quality methodology and large sample size are required to investigate the effectiveness of deliberate hypotension with propofol for FESS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.