ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2013
C-Peptide and its career from innocent bystander to active player in diabetic atherogenesis.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- C-peptide and epicardial adipose tissue in dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The role of C-peptide in diabetes and its complications: an updated review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- The Impact of C-Peptide and Diabetes Mellitus on Coronary Ectasia and Effect of Coronary Ectasia and C-Peptide on Long-Term Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of clinical practice · 2022Article
- Genetic predictors of cardiovascular morbidity in Bardet-Biedl syndrome.Clinical genetics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence and prevalence of diabetes are increasing worldwide. According to the International Diabetes Federation, more than 55 million people in the European region have diabetes, and this number is expected to rise to 64 million in 2030, with most of the cases being due to type 2 diabetes. Diabetes is associated with potentially serious microvascular and macrovascular complications such as nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy as well as coronary artery disease. The pathophysiological mechanism behind this phenomenon is complex. In recent years the impact of proinsulin C-peptide in the development of vascular disease has been highlighted, but it displays differential function in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. In type 1 diabetes, which is characterized by a lack of insulin and C-peptide, supplementation of C-peptide has been shown to improve microvascular complications. In type 2 diabetes, however, C-peptide levels are increased above normal levels and correlate with the occurrence of macrovascular complications and cardiovascular deaths. This review focuses on the impact of C-peptide in the atherogenic process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.