ReviewJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2013
Anti-cancer IAP antagonists promote bone metastasis: a cautionary tale.
Review in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting programmed cell death: a novel therapeutic paradigm for cancer based on mode-of-death classification.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Review
- Cancer associated fibroblasts and metabolic reprogramming: unraveling the intricate crosstalk in tumor evolution.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024Review
- Osteoblasts and osteoclasts: an important switch of tumour cell dormancy during bone metastasis.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2022Review
- Manipulation of the Alternative NF-κB Pathway in Mice Has Sexually Dimorphic Effects on Bone.JBMR plus · 2019Article
- Non-apoptotic Caspase regulation of stem cell properties.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2018Review
- Learning on the Fly: The Interplay between Caspases and Cancer.BioMed research international · 2018Review
- Overcoming chemotherapy drug resistance by targeting inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs).Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2017Review
- Small-molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interactions: progressing toward the reality.Chemistry & biology · 2014Review
- The BIRC6 gene as a novel target for therapy of prostate cancer: dual targeting of inhibitors of apoptosis.Oncotarget · 2014Article
- Dynamic changes in the expression of apoptosis-related genes in differentiating gonocytes and in seminomas.Asian journal of andrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The bone microenvironment is complex, containing bone-forming osteoblasts, bone-resorbing osteoclasts, bone-maintaining osteocytes, hematopoietic lineage cells, as well as blood vessels, nerves, and stromal cells. Release of embedded growth factors from the bone matrix via osteoclast resorption has been shown to participate in the alteration of bone microenvironment to facilitate tumor metastasis to this organ. Many types of malignancies including solid tumors and leukemias are associated with elevated levels of inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins, and IAP antagonists represent an important emerging class of anti-cancer agents. IAPs exert anti-apoptotic roles by inhibiting caspases and upregulating pro-survival proteins, at least in part by activating classical NF-κB signaling. In addition, IAPs act as negative regulators in the alternative NF-κB pathway, so that IAP antagonists stimulate this pathway. The role of the classical NF-κB pathway in IAP antagonist-induced apoptosis has been extensively studied, whereas much less attention has been paid to the role of these agents in the alternative pathway. Thus far, several IAP antagonists have been tested in preclinical and early stage clinical trials, and have shown promise in sensitizing tumor cells to apoptosis without significant side effects. However, recent preclinical evidence suggests an increased risk of bone metastasis caused by IAP antagonists, along with potential for promoting osteoporosis. In this review, the connection between IAP antagonists, the alternative NF-κB pathway, osteoclasts, and bone metastasis are discussed. In light of these effects of IAP antagonists on the bone microenvironment, more attention should be paid to this and other host tissues as these drugs are developed further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.