Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23740277›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2013

Effect of intensive care environment on family and patient satisfaction: a before-after study.

Irene P Jongerden, Arjen J Slooter, Linda M Peelen, Hester Wessels, Colette M Ram, Jozef Kesecioglu, Margriet M Schneider, Diederik van Dijk

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Family Satisfaction in a Medical College Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Unit (ICU)-How Can We Improve?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. [Communicating with families in the ICU : Background and practical recommendations].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Measuring family satisfaction in an Indian Intensive Care Unit.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2015
    Article
  20. Defining the Medical Intensive Care Unit in the Words of Patients and Their Family Members: A Freelisting Analysis.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Irene P JongerdenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room F.06-149, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. i.p.jongerden@umcutrecht.nl
Arjen J Slooter
Linda M Peelen
Hester Wessels
Colette M Ram
Jozef Kesecioglu
Margriet M Schneider
Diederik van Dijk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine to what extent intensive care unit environment affects family and patient satisfaction.

methodsA before-after study was performed in one university hospital in The Netherlands, 2 months before and 2 months after the migration of an intensive care unit (ICU) with multiple beds on a ward to a newly built ICU with all single rooms. Family and patient satisfaction were determined by two surveys: family satisfaction with care in the ICU and patient satisfaction with care in the ICU, respectively.

resultsFrom 387 of 617 (63 %) discharged patients at least one survey (patient and/or family) was returned. Both family and patients were more satisfied with their overall ICU experience in the new ICU as compared with the old ICU. Mean scores for family satisfaction increased from 69.5 [standard deviation (SD) 16.6] to 74.1 (SD 15.2) for old and new ICU, respectively (p = 0.02). For patients, satisfaction rates increased from 63.6 (SD 18.9) to 69.6 (SD 18.3) for old and new ICU, respectively (p = 0.02). The largest differences on single items of the surveys were noted on environmental aspects.

conclusionsThis is the first study to quantify the effect of ICU environment on family and patient satisfaction. Family and patient satisfaction with ICU experience increased by 6 % in the new ICU environment with noise-reduced, single rooms with daylight, adapted colouring and improved family facilities.

Indexed as

FamilyHealth Facility EnvironmentIntensive Care UnitsPatient SatisfactionAgedConsumer BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.