Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23740101›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2013

Assessment of pharmacist's recommendation of non-prescription medicines in Brazil: a simulated patient study.

Alessandra Rezende Mesquita, Dalmare Anderson Bezerra de Oliveira Sá, Ana Patrícia Alves Lima Santos, Abilio de Almeida Neto, Divaldo Pereira Lyra

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Antimicrobial dispensing process in community pharmacies: a scoping review.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandra Rezende MesquitaLaboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS), Federal University of Sergipe, Cidade Universitária, Prof. José Aloísio Campos, Jardim Rosa Elze, São Cristóvão, CEP: 49100-000, Brazil.
Dalmare Anderson Bezerra de Oliveira Sá
Ana Patrícia Alves Lima Santos
Abilio de Almeida Neto
Divaldo Pereira Lyra
Universidade Federal de Sergipe · BRAustralian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of medicines available without a prescription has increased in Brazil as elsewhere. The Brazilian National Health Surveillance Agency recently passed a resolution emphasizing the role of Brazilian pharmacists in promoting rational use of medicines. However, evidence that Brazilian pharmacists monitor the use of non-prescription medicines in the community promoting rational use of medicines is lacking.

objectiveTo assess practice behavior of pharmacists in Brazil when providing nonprescription medicines in the community pharmacy setting.

settingThe study was conducted in 25 community pharmacies from a city of Aracaju in Brazil.

methodsSimulated patients visited a convenience sample of 25 pharmacies twice from March to July 2010. During the visits, simulated patients enacted two standardized scenarios: treatment for a persistent headache and childhood diarrhea accompanied by fever. The interactions with the pharmacists were audiovisually recorded using a hidden micro camera. Recordings were later used to fill out a questionnaire designed to evaluate practice behavior of community pharmacists.

main outcome measureThe communication and counseling skills of pharmacists in the recommendation of non-prescription medicines, aiming at the rational use of medicines.

resultsPharmacists in the study spent on average 1.5 min counseling the simulated patient. At least one question was asked to assess signs and symptoms in 50.0 % of the simulated patient visits in the headache scenario and in 56.0 % of visits in the childhood diarrhea scenario. Non-pharmacological treatment was suggested in 25 % of visits in the childhood diarrhea scenario. During the counseling process, no pharmacist advised the simulated patient about possible drug interactions, adverse reactions and what to do if the patient forgot to take the medicine. The pharmacists had low scores in measures of non-verbal communication. The sample of this study presented poor communication skills, compromising the treatment of the patients.

conclusionThis study showed that the pharmacists' counseling in the simulated patient assessment was insufficient, indicating a need for substantial improvement in practice behavior.

Indexed as

BrazilClinical CompetenceCommunicationCommunity Pharmacy ServicesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNonprescription DrugsPatient Education as TopicPatient SimulationPharmacistsProfessional RoleVideo RecordingNonprescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID23740101
OpenAlexW2054622925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.