Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23739739›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2013

Clustering acinetobacter strains by optical mapping.

Barry G Hall, Benjamin C Kirkup, Mathew C Riley, Miriam Barlow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Barry G HallBellingham Research Institute, Bellingham, Washington, USA.
Benjamin C Kirkup
Mathew C Riley
Miriam Barlow
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research · USUniversity of California, Merced · US

Funding

Determining the fitness effects of antibiotic resistance genesR15GM090164 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MERCED · PI BARLOW, MIRIAM · 2010 to 2010
$213k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R15GM090164-01A1NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM090164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical mapping is a technique that produces an ordered restriction map of a bacterial or eukaryotic chromosome. We have developed a new method, the BOP method, to compare experimental optical maps with in silico optical maps of complete genomes to infer the presence/absence of short DNA sequences (bops) in each genome. The BOP method, as implemented by the Optical Mapping suite of four programs, circumvents the necessity of whole-genome multiple alignments and permits reliable strain typing and clustering on the basis of optical maps. We have applied the Optical Mapping Suite to 125 strains of Acinetobacter sp., including 11 completely sequenced genomes and 114 Acinetobacter complex from three US military hospitals. We found that optical mapping completely resolves all 125 strains. Signal to noise analysis showed that when the 125 strains were considered together almost 1/3 of the experimental fragments were misidentified. We found that the set of 125 genomes could be divided into three clusters, two of which included sequenced genomes. Signal to noise analysis after clustering showed that only 3.5% of the experimental restriction fragments were misidentified. Minimum spanning trees of the two clusters that included sequenced genomes are presented. The programs we have developed provide a more rigorous approach for analyzing optical map data than previously existed.

Indexed as

AcinetobacterAcinetobacter InfectionsBacterial Typing TechniquesCluster AnalysisGenome, BacterialHumansOptical Restriction MappingSequence Analysis, DNAepidemiologygenome alignmentoptical mapping

Identifiers

PMID23739739
PMCPMC3698929
OpenAlexW1993216697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.