ArticleCommunicative & integrative biology2012
Molecular mechanism of the "feedback loop" model of carcinogenesis.
Article in Communicative & integrative biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive bioinformatics analysis reveals prognostic significance and immunological roles of WNT gene family in breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- SOX10, MITF, and microRNAs: Decoding their interplay in regulating melanoma plasticity.International journal of cancer · 2025Review
- Sirtuins as Key Regulators in Pancreatic Cancer: Insights into Signaling Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.Cancers · 2024Review
- Biomaterials for Mimicking and Modelling Tumor Microenvironment.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Review
- Signaling pathways in intestinal homeostasis and colorectal cancer: KRAS at centre stage.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is commonly accepted that cancer is a genetic disease. The current prevailing theory of carcinogenesis is the somatic mutation theory of carcinogenesis and metastasis (SMT). This theory postulates that mutations in epithelial cells lead to uncontrolled proliferation of tumor cells in a cell-autonomous fashion. This cell-autonomy is increasingly criticized. Current data suggest that the tumor microenvironment is also strongly involved in carcinogenesis. Recently, we published a hypothesis that considers the important contribution of the tumor microenvironment in carcinogenesis and complements the classical clonal evolution model. Essentially, this "feedback loop model" (FBM) postulates that the physiological communication between cancer cells and stromal cells in inflammatory or proliferative conditions is altered by anomalous signal processing within the parenchymal cells. The inability of parenchymal cells to correctly finalize the intercellular communication might result in a perpetuation of the activated state of cells and the tumor micromilieu. The FBM is unique among the tissue-based models because in this model tumor and stromal cells interact together in a reciprocal manner to form the cancer phenotype. Contrary to the SMT, the FBM postulates that mutated genes act in a cell-heteronomous fashion, not in a cell-autonomously fashion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.