Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23739158›Full record

ArticleJournal of human hypertension2013

Blood pressure variability and multiple organ damage in primary hypertension.

G Leoncini, F Viazzi, G Storace, G Deferrari, R Pontremoli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Correlation between short-term blood pressure variability and left-ventricular mass index: a meta-analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Blood pressure variability as predictor of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity in patients with Multiple Myeloma.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Sex Differences in the Renal Vascular Responses of ATInternational journal of hypertension · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

G LeonciniDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino - IST, Genoa, Italy.
F Viazzi
G Storace
G Deferrari
R Pontremoli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organ damage (OD) is an indicator of increased cardiovascular risk. Blood pressure variability (BPV) is related to greater incidence of events, regardless of the severity of hypertension. We investigated the relationship between ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM)-derived indices of BPV and the presence of multiple OD in primary hypertension (PH). One hundred and sixty-nine untreated patients with PH were evaluated. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) variability were assessed as the crude and weighted (w.) standard deviation (s.d.), and average real variability (ARV) of the mean value of 24-h, awake and asleep ABPM recordings. Left ventricular mass index, intima-media thickness, estimated-glomerular filtration rate and urinary albumin excretion were assessed as indices of cardiac, vascular and renal damage, respectively. Risk profile progressively increased starting from patients without OD to patients with only one sign of OD, and then to those with multiple OD. In addition to greater severity of the organ involvement, the only variables that were found to significantly differ between subjects with multiple and single OD were office SBP (160 ± 14 vs 154 ± 11 mm  Hg, P=0.0423) and DBP (101 ± 7 vs 97 ± 8  mm Hg, P=0.0291), ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) (0.60 ± 0.10 vs 0.50 ± 0.17, P=0.0158) and indices of BPV (24-h SBP s.d., 23 ± 5 vs 20 ± 6  mm  Hg, P=0.0300; awake SBP s.d., 22 ± 6 vs 19 ± 6  mm  Hg, P=0.0366; 24-h SBP w.s.d., 20 ± 5 vs 17 ± 5  mm  Hg, P=0.0385; and 24-h SBP ARV, 18 ± 4 vs 15 ± 5  mm  Hg, P=0.0420). All the above mentioned BPV parameters turned out to be determinants of multiple OD, regardless of several confounding variables, including BP levels. Therefore, in hypertensive patients increased SBP variability is associated with multiple signs of OD, regardless of BP values.

Indexed as

Blood PressureAdultBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCarotid Artery DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansHypertensionHypertrophy, Left VentricularItalyKidney DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrevalencePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID23739158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.