ReviewContinuum (Minneapolis, Minn.)2013
Status epilepticus.
Review in Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breaking the seizure cycle: Belgian expert consensus on the diagnostics and treatment of acute convulsive seizures in children.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Review
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Management of Non-convulsive Seizures: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Article
- Amperometric bio-sensing of lactate and oxygen concurrently with local field potentials during status epilepticus.Talanta · 2024Article
- Convulsive Status Epilepticus in a Cohort of Patients from a Peruvian Academic Hospital.Journal of epilepsy research · 2021Article
- Review
- Characteristics of the patients who admitted to the emergency department with seizures and the factors affecting the frequency of admission.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2021Article
- Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES): prevalence, impact and management strategies.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2019Article
- Antiepileptic drugs in critically ill patients.Critical care (London, England) · 2018Review
- Ictal Interictal Continuum Patterns.Current treatment options in neurology · 2018Review
- When aphasia is due to aphasic status epilepticus: a diagnostic challenge.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018Article
- EEG Characteristics of Successful Burst Suppression for Refractory Status Epilepticus.Neurocritical care · 2016Article
- Epilepsy: Status epilepticus epidemiology--tracking a moving target.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review presents the state of the art in the diagnosis and management of status epilepticus. RECENT
findingsIn addition to general background, this article presents the most recent findings regarding the diagnosis and treatment of status epilepticus, including the results of the Rapid Anticonvulsant Medication Prior to Arrival Trial (RAMPART) and the available data on the use of newer antiepileptic and anesthetic drugs in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus. It also presents available guidelines such as those from the Neurocritical Care Society. SUMMARY: Despite recent advances, the management of status epilepticus remains a challenge. Rapid treatment, a written treatment protocol, early consideration of nonconvulsive seizures, and avoiding overtreatment and medical complications are the keys to successful management. This article summarizes the current evidence and guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.