Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23739101›Full record

ReviewContinuum (Minneapolis, Minn.)2013

Neuroimaging in investigation of patients with epilepsy.

Fernando Cendes

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Epileptic seizures.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania) · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Epilepsy: Is there hope?The Indian journal of medical research · 2016
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Neuroimaging of epilepsy.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fernando CendesDepartamento de Neurologia, FCM, UNICAMP, Campinas, SP 13083-880, Brazil. fcendes@unicamp.br
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review discusses the MRI and functional imaging findings in patients with focal seizures, practical ways to improve the detection of subtle lesions, and limitations and pitfalls of the various imaging techniques in this context. RECENT

findingsA proper MRI investigation of patients with focal epilepsy requires the use of specific protocols, selected based on identification of the region of onset by clinical and EEG information. For practical purposes, the focal epilepsies are divided here into mesial temporal lobe epilepsies and neocortical epilepsies. The majority of patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsies associated with hippocampal sclerosis undergoing presurgical evaluation will have a clear-cut unilateral atrophic hippocampus with increased T2 signal and a normal-appearing contralateral hippocampus. Among the several types of neocortical lesions, focal cortical dysplasias deserve especial attention because these lesions are often missed on routine MRIs. The focal cortical dysplasias include a gradient of morphologic changes from dysplastic lesions that can be easily identified by conventional MRI techniques to minor structural abnormalities with small areas of discrete cortical thickening and blurring of the gray/white matter interface that often go unrecognized. SUMMARY: The use of MRI protocols targeted for the study of patients with epilepsy allows the diagnosis of the etiology of epilepsy in most patients with focal seizures. However, in a considerable number of patients with epilepsy, MRI results are considered normal. Although the etiology remains unclear in these cases, the malformations of cortical development (mainly focal cortical dysplasias) have been identified as most likely pathologic substrates. The effort involved in trying to increase the detection of these "invisible" lesions involves the improvement of structural imaging techniques and the combination of metabolic and functional studies, including 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET), ictal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), diffusion MRI, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). The methods used to enhance the detection of subtle cortical abnormalities by improving the structural images have addressed two basic aspects of the examination by MRI: signal acquisition and imaging postprocessing.

Indexed as

EpilepsyFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID23739101
PMCPMC10564042
OpenAlexW2326415576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.