Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23738518›Full record

ArticleGenes, brain, and behavior2013

A genome-wide association study for reading and language abilities in two population cohorts.

M Luciano, D M Evans, N K Hansell, S E Medland, G W Montgomery, N G Martin, M J Wright, T C Bates

Open access · hybridAbstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, brain, and behavior, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Geneticization of Education and Its Bioethical Implications.Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Potential of Children's Rearing Environment to Overcome Genetic Propensity for Low Reading Achievement.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M LucianoCentre for Cognitive Aging and Cognitive Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. michelle.luciano@ed.ac.uk
D M Evans
N K Hansell
S E Medland
G W Montgomery
N G Martin
M J Wright
T C Bates
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUAlzheimer Scotland · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/4Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 092731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candidate genes have been identified for both reading and language, but most of the heritable variance in these traits remains unexplained. Here, we report a genome-wide association meta-analysis of two large cohorts: population samples of Australian twins and siblings aged 12-25 years (n = 1177 from 538 families), and a younger cohort of children of the UK Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and their Children (aged 8 and 9 years; maximum n = 5472). Suggestive association was indicated for reading measures and non-word repetition (NWR), with the greatest support found for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the pseudogene, ABCC13 (P = 7.34 × 10(-8)), and the gene, DAZAP1 (P = 1.32 × 10(-6)). Gene-based analyses showed significant association (P < 2.8 × 10(-6)) for reading and spelling with genes CD2L1, CDC2L2 and RCAN3 in two loci on chromosome 1. Some support was found for the same SNPs having effects on both reading skill and NWR, which is compatible with behavior genetic evidence for influences of reading acquisition on phonological-task performance. The results implicate novel candidates for study in additional cohorts for reading and language abilities.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyLanguage DevelopmentReadingAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdolescentAdultATP-Binding Cassette TransportersCase-Control StudiesChildChromosomes, Human, Pair 1Cyclin-Dependent KinasesDyslexiaFemaleGenetic LociHumansLanguage TestsABCC13 pseudogene, humanAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingATP-Binding Cassette TransportersCDK11a protein, humanCyclin-Dependent KinasesDAZAP1 protein, humanRCAN3 protein, humanRNA-Binding ProteinsAssociationdyslexiagenesGWASlanguagereading

Identifiers

PMID23738518
PMCPMC3908370
OpenAlexW2126501039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.