Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23738295›Full record

ArticleMuscles, ligaments and tendons journal2012

Biodegradable synthetic scaffolds for tendon regeneration.

Ernesto Reverchon, Lucia Baldino, Stefano Cardea, Iolanda De Marco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Muscles, ligaments and tendons journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Injectable Biomaterials for Dental Tissue Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  13. Effects of SCCOInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Is It Time to Start Transitioning From 2D to 3D Cell Culture?Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Advances in biology and mechanics of rotator cuff repair.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2015
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ernesto ReverchonDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Italy.
Lucia Baldino
Stefano Cardea
Iolanda De Marco

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue regeneration is aimed at producing biological or synthetic scaffolds to be implanted in the body for regenerate functional tissues. Several techniques and materials have been used to obtain biodegradable synthetic scaffolds, on which adhesion, growth, migration and differentiation of human cells has been attempted. Scaffolds for tendon regeneration have been less frequently proposed, because they have a complex hierarchical structure and it is very difficult to mimic their peculiar mechanical properties. In this review, we critically analyzed the proposed materials and fabrication techniques for tendon tissue engineering and we indicated new preparation processes, based on the use of supercritical fluids, to produce scaffolds with characteristics very similar to the native tendon structure.

Indexed as

cells cultivationsupercritical fluidssynthetic scaffoldstendon tissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID23738295
PMCPMC3666526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.