ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2013
Mechanically assisted intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute cerebral infarction.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of mechanically assisted thrombolysis in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction. Mechanically assisted intra-arterial urokinase thrombolysis was conducted on 28 patients with acute cerebral infarction with a disease onset time of 90-450 min. The maximum level of urokinase was 1,150,000 units. Thrombus disruption with a microwire, retrieval with a microcatheter and stent-assisted revascularization were performed. The recanalization rate, bleeding complications and modified Rankin scale (mRS) score were observed within 3 months of surgery. Our results showed that mechanically assisted thrombolysis was successfully conducted on 23 patients, with a recanalization rate of 82.1% (23/28), average recanalization time of 65.22 min and mRS score ≤3.5. Five cases of recanalization were invalid, including 2 cases of mortality, 1 case with an mRS score of 4 and 2 cases with an mRS score ≤3. In the recanalization group, the mechanically assisted thrombolysis did not increase the number of bleeding complications. Our study demonstrated that the safety of mechanically assisted thrombolysis for the treatment of acute cerebral infarction is equivalent to that of simple intra-arterial thrombolysis, but that the former has a higher efficiency. Mechanically assisted thrombolysis is able to reduce the urokinase dosage and recanalization time, and increase the recanalization rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.