Preventing ovarian cancer by salpingectomy.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
   Pooled it
2. Unveiling the Promise: A Comprehensive Review of Salpingectomy as a Vanguard for Ovarian Cancer Prevention.Cureus · 2024
   Review
3. The effect of prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy on ovarian reserve in patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy.Journal of ovarian research · 2021
   Article
4. Evaluation of ovarian function after hysterectomy with or without salpingectomy: A feasible study.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2017
   Article
5. Opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention.Gynecologic oncology research and practice · 2015
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Erratum issued

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.