ArticleWorld journal of surgery2013
Laparoscopy-assisted hybrid left-side donor hepatectomy.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pure laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatectomy in pediatric living donor liver transplantation: a review and meta-analysis.Hepatology international · 2023Pooled it
- Different techniques for harvesting grafts for living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017Pooled it
- Laparoscopy-Assisted versus Open Hepatectomy for Live Liver Donor: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Donor safety in live donor laparoscopic liver procurement: systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2015Pooled it
- Achievements, Challenges and Promises of Minimally Invasive Liver Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Review
- Impact of thoracic shape on the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted living donor hepatectomy.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2024Article
- Global dissemination of minimally invasive living donor hepatectomy: What are the barriers?World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Review
- Donor quality of life after living donor liver transplantation: a review of the literature.Digestive medicine research · 2021Article
- Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet?World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Review
- Laparoscopic living-donor hepatectomy: Review of its current status.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2021Review
- Pure Laparoscopic Living Donor Hepatectomy With/Without Fluorescence-Assisted Technology and Conventional Open Procedure: A Retrospective Study in Mainland China.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
- Minimally invasive donor hepatectomy, are we ready for prime time?World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Review
- Short-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted hybrid living donor hepatectomy: a comparison with the conventional open procedure.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Observational
- Evolution and revolution of laparoscopic liver resection in Japan.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2017Review
- Laparoscopic liver resection: Experience based guidelines.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2016Review
- Laparoscopic liver resection for living donation: where do we stand?World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Laparoscopic liver resection: wedge resections to living donor hepatectomy, are we heading in the right direction?World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Laparoscopy-assisted hybrid left-side donor hepatectomy: is it truly less invasive for living donors?World journal of surgery · 2014Article
- Laparoscopy-assisted hybrid left-side donor hepatectomy: rationale for performing LADH.World journal of surgery · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic liver resection developed for live liver donors has the advantage of reducing the physical and mental stress in donors. However, its safety and efficacy still remain to be established. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted hybrid donor hepatectomy (LADH) to obtain left side grafts. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 31 consecutive live liver donors of left side liver grafts underwent LADH, including left lateral segmentectomy (n = 17) and left liver resection with or without the caudate lobe (n = 14) (LADH group). We compared the clinical data between the LADH group and the group of donors in whom traditional open donor hepatectomy was performed to procure the liver graft (open donor hepatectomy [ODH] group, n = 79).
resultsLaparoscopy-assisted hybrid donor hepatectomy was feasible in all patients, and there was no mortality over a follow-up period of 13.9 ± 9.8 months. The operative time to procure a left-lobe graft was significantly longer in the LADH group (510 ± 90 min) than in the ODH group (P < 0.001). A large right lobe on CT (RPv distance) was identified as a significant risk factor for prolonged operative time (P = 0.007). Evaluation using the SF36-v2 questionnaire revealed faster recovery of the physical component summary score and bodily pain score in the LADH group than in the ODH group.
conclusionsLaparoscopy-assisted hybrid donor hepatectomy for procuring left side grafts was safe and effective up to the left liver with the caudate lobe. Left-lobe LADH in donors with a large right lobe should be carefully planned in view of the potential surgical difficulty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.