ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2013
Optoacoustic imaging and tomography: reconstruction approaches and outstanding challenges in image performance and quantification.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
73 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photoacoustic imaging: An emerging tool for intraoperative margin assessment in breast-conserving surgery.Photoacoustics · 2026Review
- Application of photoacoustic imaging in tumor diagnosis and surgical treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Temporally delayed, dual-pulse, dual-wavelength photoacoustic imaging (TD-DP-DW-PAI): advancing capabilities of a commercial light-emitting diode-based photoacoustic imaging system with a pulsed laser diode.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Limited-view photoacoustic imaging reconstruction via high-quality self-supervised neural representation.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
- Nanophotonic-enhanced photoacoustic imaging for brain tumor detection.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Quantitative photoacoustic imaging using known chromophores as fluence marker.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
- Current trends in the characterization and monitoring of vascular response to cancer therapy.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Review
- Potential applications for photoacoustic imaging using functional nanoparticles: A comprehensive overview.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Recent Advances in Photoacoustic Imaging: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Handheld interventional ultrasound/photoacoustic puncture needle navigation based on deep learning segmentation.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- 3D Ultrasonic Brain Imaging with Deep Learning Based on Fully Convolutional Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Spiral volumetric optoacoustic tomography for imaging whole-body biodynamics in small animals.Nature protocols · 2023Review
- Multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT): Monitoring neurovascular changes in a mouse repetitive traumatic brain injury model.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2023Article
- PATLAB: A graphical computational software package for photoacoustic computed tomography research.Photoacoustics · 2022Article
- Article
- Contrast Agents for Photoacoustic Imaging: A Review Focusing on the Wavelength Range.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Alginate beads as a highly versatile test-sample for optoacoustic imaging.Photoacoustics · 2022Article
- Multi-Scale Photoacoustic Assessment of Wound Healing Using Chitosan-Graphene Oxide Hemostatic Sponge.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A scalable open-source MATLAB toolbox for reconstruction and analysis of multispectral optoacoustic tomography data.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Label-free concurrent 5-modal microscopy (Co5M) resolves unknown spatio-temporal processes in wound healing.Communications biology · 2021Article
13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper comprehensively reviews the emerging topic of optoacoustic imaging from the image reconstruction and quantification perspective. Optoacoustic imaging combines highly attractive features, including rich contrast and high versatility in sensing diverse biological targets, excellent spatial resolution not compromised by light scattering, and relatively low cost of implementation. Yet, living objects present a complex target for optoacoustic imaging due to the presence of a highly heterogeneous tissue background in the form of strong spatial variations of scattering and absorption. Extracting quantified information on the actual distribution of tissue chromophores and other biomarkers constitutes therefore a challenging problem. Image quantification is further compromised by some frequently-used approximated inversion formulae. In this review, the currently available optoacoustic image reconstruction and quantification approaches are assessed, including back-projection and model-based inversion algorithms, sparse signal representation, wavelet-based approaches, methods for reduction of acoustic artifacts as well as multi-spectral methods for visualization of tissue bio-markers. Applicability of the different methodologies is further analyzed in the context of real-life performance in small animal and clinical in-vivo imaging scenarios.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.