ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2013
Clinical trials of human papillomavirus vaccines and beyond.
Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 69 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 178 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between Human Papillomavirus and Non-cervical Genital Cancers in Brazil: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2018Pooled it
- Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Extending the Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Programme to Include Males in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of the Cost-Effectiveness Studies.Clinical drug investigation · 2015Pooled it
- Long-term safety of human papillomavirus vaccination in relation to early pregnancy outcomes: registry-based follow-up of a community-randomized trial.European journal of public health · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Head-to-head comparison of two human papillomavirus vaccines for efficacy against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and adenocarcinomaFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Trial
- Effectiveness of various human papillomavirus vaccination strategies: A community randomized trial in Finland.Cancer medicine · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Safety of the human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in adolescents aged 12-15 years: Interim analysis of a large community-randomized controlled trial.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016Trial
- Efficacy of human papillomavirus 16 and 18 (HPV-16/18) AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer in young women: final event-driven analysis of the randomized, double-blind PATRICIA trial.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2015Trial
- Protective Human Papillomavirus Type 16/18 Vaccine-Induced Neutralizing Antibody Levels Remain Elusive.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Review
- The impact of medical expert-led sex education on sexual health knowledge among Japanese junior high school students: a quantitative study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Review
- AS04 drives superior cross-protective antibody response by increased NOTCH signaling of dendritic cells and proliferation of memory B cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Glycan-induced structural activation softens the human papillomavirus capsid for entry through reduction of intercapsomere flexibility.Nature communications · 2024Article
- A safe and potentiated multi-type HPV L2-E7 nanoparticle vaccine with combined prophylactic and therapeutic activity.NPJ vaccines · 2024Article
- Oral and periodontal manifestation related during human papilloma virus infections: Update on early prognostic factors.Heliyon · 2024Review
- HPV genotypes in invasive cervical cancer: prevalence, risk attribution, and optimized vaccine strategies in western China.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Do Concurrent Multiple Infections with High-Risk HPVs Carry a More Malignant Potential than a Single Infection in the Uterine Cervix?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infectious agent; its 14 oncogenic types are causally associated with 5-10% of all cancers. The major structural HPV protein self-assembles into immunogenic virus-like particles. Two licensed HPV vaccines--the bivalent vaccine comprising HPV types 16 and 18, and the quadrivalent vaccine comprising HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18--have proven to be safe and efficacious against 6-month-persistent cervical infections of HPV16 and HPV18 and associated precancerous lesions, and both have efficacies of 90-100%. Among baseline HPV-negative adolescent females, vaccine efficacies against the immediate precursor of cervical cancer (intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3) irrespective of HPV type are 93.2% and 43.0% for the bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines, respectively. The quadrivalent vaccine is efficacious (>75% vaccine efficacy) against any of the more-severe precursors of vulval, vaginal and anal cancers. A strong increase in vaccine efficacy with increasing severity of the precancerous lesion is explained by accumulation of the most-oncogenic HPV types 16 and 18 in these lesions. Therefore, prophylactic HPV vaccination will exceed the best results from screening for cancer. With the extremely efficacious prophylactic HPV vaccines, the focus of organized intervention (vaccination and screening) programmes should, however, shift from reducing the HPV disease burden to controlling the prevalence of oncogenic HPV (and nononcogenic HPV) types. Eradication of the major oncogenic HPV types should be pursued.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.