Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23736274›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2013

Circulating tumor cells in metastatic colorectal cancer: do we need an alternative cutoff?

P Gazzaniga, C Raimondi, A Gradilone, G Biondi Zoccai, C Nicolazzo, O Gandini, F Longo, S Tomao, G Lo Russo, P Seminara and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

P GazzanigaDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00141 Rome, Italy. paola.gazzaniga@uniroma1.it
C Raimondi
A Gradilone
G Biondi Zoccai
C Nicolazzo
O Gandini
F Longo
S Tomao
G Lo Russo
P Seminara
B Vincenzi
I Chimenti
M Cristofanilli
L Frati
E Cortesi
Sapienza University of Rome · ITThomas Jefferson University · USUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the prognostic and predictive value of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) irrespective of detection level. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe evaluated the prognostic and predictive significance of CTC count at baseline and under treatment in 119 mCRC subjects and compared the standard cutoff (≥3 CTCs/7.5 mL to ≥1 CTCs/7.5 mL).

resultsAn overall comparison was made between patients with 0, 1-2 and ≥3 CTC (median PFS 8, 4 and 5 months, respectively). Two poor prognostic groups were found, including patients with ≥1 CTCs before and during treatment and patients with 0 CTC at baseline who converted to ≥1 CTCs (p = 0.014).

conclusionsThe presence of at least 1 CTC at baseline count is predictive for poor prognosis in mCRC patients. Patients with 1-2 CTC should be switched from the favorable prognostic group--conventionally defined by the presence of <3 CTC--to the unfavorable, deserving a more careful monitoring.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReference ValuesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID23736274
PMCPMC11824719
OpenAlexW2075022189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.