Coaching for health: holding the curtains so patients can change.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Training in health coaching skills for health professionals who work with people with progressive neurological conditions: A realist evaluation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
   Article
2. Coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2017
   Review
3. GPs asking patients to self-rate their health: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
   Article
4. Self-rated health in general practice: a plea for subjectivity.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as